
Do you still think Barack Obama snubbed retired soldiers?
Total Votes: 2664
Upon reading a Newsvine user's seed of a blog that used unsourced information that said the following:
According to TSO who was at the "Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball", this newly sworn-in President for the first time in 56 years blew off the ball (that's 14 Inaugurations).
Some background on the ball;
The American Legion sponsors the ball, which recognizes recipients of Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military award. It started in 1953 for President Dwight D. Eisenhower's first inauguration.
Event co-sponsors include 13 other veterans service organizations, among them the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the Paralyzed Veterans of America.
So where was our new President instead of honoring Medal of Honor recipients who by some miracle are still alive? According to Huffington Post, this was his schedule for Inaugural celebrations;
Later that day, the Presidential Inaugural Committee will host 10 official inaugural balls:
— Neighborhood Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.
— Obama Home States (Illinois and Hawaii) Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.
— Biden Home States (Pennsylvania and Delaware) Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.
— Midwest Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.
— Mid-Atlantic Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.
— Western Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.
— Commander in Chief's Ball at the National Building Museum.
— Southern Inaugural Ball at the National Guard Armory.
— Eastern Inaugural Ball at Union Station.
— Youth Inaugural Ball at the Washington Hilton.
Unofficial balls include:
— Congressional Black Caucus Inaugural Ball at the Capitol Hilton.
— Creative Coalition Inaugural Ball at the Harman Center for the Arts.
— Recording Industry Association of America's ball for Feeding America.
— BET's Inaugural Ball at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel.
— Africa on the Potomac inaugural celebration at Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Va.
— American Music Inaugural Ball at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel.
— Inaugural Purple Ball at the Fairmont Hotel.
— Human Rights Campaign's Equality Ball at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel.
— Inaugural Peace Ball at the Smithsonian National Postal Museum.
— Impact Film Fund ball.
Mr. Wolf from Blackfive sends along this link to which Inaugural Balls Obama actually attended last night.
Blackfive, which I read occasionally for military pieces, confirmed that President Obama did not come to the inaugural ball. So I became curious because the only two sources were two blogs and one source that consisted of initials. Therefore, I did what any rational person would do: I contacted the American Legion to get the straight story from the people who would know. I was put in contact with a very pleasant gentleman named Craig Roberts who is the American Legion's Media Relations Manager and after our conversation he e-mailed me this statement which I will include in its entirety:
In answer to your inquiry:
The American Legion, as it has on every inauguration evening since 1953, hosted the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball on January 20th. The quadrennial event is co-sponsored with fourteen veterans service and military service organizations and honors recipients of the Medal of Honor. Forty-seven of these heroes attended this year's event which was held in the Renaissance Washington DC Hotel.
President Obama was invited but did not attend. Vice-President Joe Biden did appear, however, and was very warmly received. The new President's absence was understandable considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the necessary attendant security measures. The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or "snubbed."
Thank you,
Craig Roberts
Media Relations Manager
The American Legion
1608 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
202.263.2982 (direct)
First of all, I would like to thank Mr. Roberts for taking my call and taking the time to compose this statement so that I can share it on behalf of the American Legion. So to those fellow Obama supporters that think this ball did not happen, it did. It was omitted from the media outlets it was omitted from because of logistical challenges due to the extraordinary number of people that flooded Washington D.C. to see Barack Obama be inaugurated as the 44th president and it is not yet on the American Legion's website (as I type this at 8:30 A.M. on 1-23-09) because of some difficulties in updating the website. However, there will be media coverage of the event forthcoming.
I have found out also that the likely reason that Barack Obama attended the auxiliary balls that he did is because six of the balls that he attended were held in the same building. Therefore, attending those balls and the others that he attended were the most efficient with regards to security. It is no secret that President Obama has had questions surrounding his security, that is evident by observing that he was the earliest presidential candidate ever to get a security detail. If the Secret Service felt it prudent to guard him so early in the campaign can the reader imagine what the Secret Service feels is prudent now that he is the President of the United States?
The most likely reason that President Obama did not go to the "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball is because it was held in the Renaissance Hotel which consists of 16 floors. There was an event called the "Illinois Party - Presidential Event" held at the Renaissance the night before that the then-President-elect did not attend either (I have a call in to the President's press office asking for confirmation of this information which was given to me by one of my sources for this story). Given the amount of time and resources it would have taken to clear a 16 floor hotel as well as protect it while President Obama was inside, I can only guess that he was advised by his Presidential Protection Detail not to attend either inaugural ball because of the building and the inherent problems in securing and then protecting it. The sheer number of people crowding the streets and staying in the hotel surely presented a formidable screening problem as well. But, there's your story... it's not as sexy as "Barack Obama Hates The Military" but it is the truth as best I can tell after talking to the organization responsible for hosting the event and doing some research and educated guesswork about why a security team wouldn't want to protect a principal in the Renaissance with more than 2 million extra people in Washington D.C.
Update: It would appear that, according to Stars & Stripes that Obama had some Medal of Honor recipients at an inaugural ball that he attended. This gives the number of living Medal of Honor recipients as 99, but I believe that two have passed away since that number was compiled leaving 97. There are 7 in this picture and there were 47 at the American Legion inaugural event. I'm curious if there were more at the event this photo was taken at.
Further update: I received an e-mail from Mr. Roberts today (which I would have gotten yesterday if I had not miscommunicated my e-mail address to him) with his original statement along with a new statement. I will include both statements in their entirety:
My statement on behalf of our National Adjutant, Dan Wheeler:
"The American Legion, as it has on every inauguration evening since
1953, hosted the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball on January
20th . The quadrennial event is co-sponsored by fourteen veterans
service and military service organizations and honors recipients of the
Medal of Honor. Forty-seven of these heroes attended this year's event.
President Obama was invited but did not attend. Vice-President Joe Biden
did appear, however, and was very warmly received. From The American
Legion's point of view, the new President's absence was understandable
considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the
vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the
necessary attendant security measures. The National Adjutant of The
American Legion states that, as an organization, The Legion does not
feel offended or "snubbed" by the President's failure to appear."Mr. Wheeler's message as of noon today (January 26):
"We extended an invitation as we always do. There are numerous Balls
and we know he can't attend them all. Of course, we would have loved
for him to make an appearance, but he didn't. It's a logistical
nightmare. He did meet with the troops at the Commander In Chief's
Ball, and we are grateful for that. Our Ball wasn't about the
President; it was about the Medal of Honor recipients and the veterans
and families who were there. We are grateful that the Vice President
appeared, and our guests were very appreciative."That having been said, there are much more important issues to dwell
on, which we intend to do. We look forward to working with the new
administration on ensuring full and guaranteed funding for VA health
care services, and the very best treatment for our service people who
have been wounded, and on the quality of life of all members of the
Armed Forces and their families, as well as the maintenance of a
national security force that will deter any enemy from considering an
attack on America."
This is a good article, but please consider reformatting it, as it's kind of hard to tell your prose from the quoted material.
Just sounds to me that Obama made a good excuse on why he couldn't attend.... dosen't change the fact of the matter though.
Excellent article, Scott! Thanks for taking all that trouble. When I first read the headline of the other story I doubted it, especially because of the use of the term "blow off," which just sounded like more grist for the internet rumor mill. Thanks for verifying that gut reaction. Cheers, Carloz (formerly Gipper1)
Scott: The "fact" is that the sore losers want an excuse to dust off their favorite smears from the Clinton era, and one of them is that the President "hates the military." His speech at the CinC ball doesn't count for anything, therefore, as long as they can find one event he didn't attend.
Scott: Great piece. I am so glad to see Newsviners showing initiative and doing real journalism work, i..e. making calls and inquiries.
The more we do things like - in this case contacting Mr. Roberts - the more we can be seen as a real group of people who think for ourselves and do some journalism of our own.
Clipped to Newsviner's Picks. I'm on a campaign this year against lazy thinking and people just seeding other people's stuff without asking questions is high on my list of things we should be above doing.
The more original articles the better as far as i'm concerned.
Meta?
No excuse for a Commander in Chief. It shows his lack of respect for the military due to the fact that he is a coward and a liberal POS. That's just my opinion. He should NOT be the President of this country and the fact he is shows us where we are headed.
a liberal POS
What an exemplary american and human being you are. I'm sure whatever God you so fervently adore considers you perhaps not as qualified to throw stones as you do.
That is a good thing and fair enough too all in all. I always thought that was something most Americans shared, right and left and middle, a certain grudging tolerance of the extremes as the price of freedom.
Now people seem to barracade themselves behind a convenient label and secretly wish all the other labels were exterminated.
Sad really, used to be quite an tolerant country.
Ranger
He should NOT be the President of this country and the fact he is shows us where we are headed.
I suppose you think we were headed tn the right direction with jackass junior in office?
The President is our Commander and Chief of the military. To not show up at a function honoring the bravest of the brave is not acceptable. Other Presidents made the effort to attend so why excuses for this one???
Thank you for the reserarch, Scott. Amazing what one can find out when one takes the time and effort to get information. I started questioning when I Googled "Medal of Honor Inaugural Ball" and the only hits were from posts made after Jan 20, 2009. That made me think that there was no such thing. And I was right - as your piece points out, the event is called "Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball".
Also, the logistics probably prevented him from going - but he didn't snub them since he sent the VPOTUS. That shows that he knew about it and wanted his administration represented.
Alas, Obama's detractors will never let something like the truth get in their way, I guess.
Plus the lack of any mention in any of the media information about the ball, not listed on any of the releases ...
nice job Scott.....
Scott, if it's alright with the Legion it's alright by me. Inevitably somebody or group of somebodies gets their noses bent out of joint during an inaugural. Any number of ticket holders for the swearing-in ceremony never made it through the 3rd Street Tunnel to get in. Considering the number of people who swarmed into town last week, I think those of us who call the DC area home can be proud of the region's handling of the inauguration.
I think so.
One of my colleagues was in D.C. with her church group. She told me they couldn't see much, and the cold was excruciating, but they figured that if people in the past could suffer through fire-hoses and police dogs, they could suffer through a little cold to be part of a joyous moment in history. Anyway, she also described how people were climbing trees and climbing on top of port-a-johns to get better views, and the Park police were having the devil's own time making them stop it before anyone got hurt. Considering how easily even a happy crowd can get out of control, I think everyone in charge of keeping the inauguration orderly can take a very well deserved bow. It was a glorious occasion.
According to your list, he was in the same hotel as the veteran's ball. It's amazing how some people will let him off the hook regardless of what he does. You assume it was due to security and then say others will never accept the truth. It seems the truth is whatever you want it to be.
No need to be nasty. The individual didn't know about the two Renaissance hotels. A simple explanation would have been sufficient. I don't buy your explanation either about the security and the hotel. Security or not he should have made an appearance.... after all it was and seems to be a tradition. More importantly, it was to honor our boys who gave more than their lives to protect us. To heck with the Hollywood crowd. Roberts was only being polite, covering his butt so to speak. You don't really think he would come out against the President in writing? You can't be that naive.
Scott:
Most excellent!
Scott thanks for your research.
I think you are right, Scott. In fact, I think that will be Michelle's personal project while she is in the White House. She's already shown that she want to do something for our troops and us vets as well.
Good job clearing this up and spending time going straight to the source and sharing that info Scott. There has been a lot of septic conflict between us over a prolonged period so it's with a measure of humility and shame mixed with pleasure I extend a thank you and respect.
Nicely done, Scott. I figured there was more to the story.
Excellent piece and great research.
It's funny all the people here going "whew!"
LOL....What professional public answer do you think they would give you? Do you really think the most honorable men in the world would publicly say; "We are pissed that the CIC did not attend and it is a shameful act against America's warriors. Period. This is beyond partisan this is about our bravest men both Repub. and Demo. it has no bearing whatsoever. It makes me just plain ill. Yeah, they are gentlemen and won't say anything but they know and feel it just as I who is a Purple Heart recipient feels it. Shame on this guy. I think our men and women in uniform come before anyone and I'm sorry, when you snub them it is a sign of the Liberal transformation we are going through. Obama had gays sitting at his table at the inaugeration and he couldn't go honor the men and women of honor? Sorry....that dog don't hunt.
Job WELL done Scott--I also called AL as Iv been a member there many years and was told basicly the same as you Thanks again.
Well, I will certainly forward this to Snopes.com. Guess I have to eat my words about my assumption that the whole story was made up out of whole cloth, but obviously the new administration did pay its respects to the event, in the person of Joe Biden, and Obama's absence offended no one except the 45th fighting keyboard brigade. Thanks very much for the research!!
he attended the Comm in Chief ball via satellite. Even Clinton went to the CMH ball. He could rob a bank on national TV and you would say it's an attempt to stimulate the economy.
Scott,
Great job here. Thanks for all your time and perseverance following this up. Nice to be able to put at least one piece of propaganda to bed all due to to your efforts.
But you know the people who love these narratives. They'll never EVER give it up.
They'll never EVER give it up.
I just heard this morning that some folks STILL believe Obama is a Muslim even after the inauguration.
Damm you are all wrong President Obama didn't attend that ball because he was to pissed at all the righties that were there.
Next time tell them to only bring left hand vets to the ball and he'll be there.
Thanks Scott for all the effort. Very much appecitated.
Grin! But what about the ambidextrous community, eh?
Good effort to get at the heart. Well done.
Scott, what a bunch of work! And great work too! Thanks.
Thank you for your explanation.
Have your written a comment about this at "This Ain't Hell" () or would you rather just beat your forehead on your desk? Their position on this is obnoxious. Clearly, they have decided it was an intentional snub. Right. The new president is going to snub MOH winners because he's, what, an idiot? Of course, there's no mention on the site that the MOH winners had special invitations and were seated on the podium for the Inauguration itself. Nor is there any mention of how the Tuskeegee airmen were guests of honor as well.
I sure hope you don't think this is real journalism. You did not vet your sources nor did you show objectivity. "
Thanks Blearc, I was happy to do it. All I ask is that you pass it around to your political friends so that everyone quickly has an answer to this charge and there isn't a major break of trust between veterans and Obama. I wanted to refute it because Obama shouldn't dignify the accusation but someone needs to explain logically why it is improbable to be a slam against military veterans.
If I thought that Obama was bad for veterans, I never would have voted for him much less worked for him. He'll do right by them, IMHO.
"
The only thing I hate worse than left -leaning media claiming to be journalist is right leaning press claiming to be "Fair and Balanced"
I draw your attention to this line from the email;
The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or “snubbed.”
What does that say to you? I know you think you did a great job here, and everyone is stroking your ego real well because you're writing what they want to read - all because you made a phone call and got the same form email they sent to everyone else who asked.
I guess we've entered a new age in which the Left doesn't bother to ask questions that might not get them answers they don't want to hear. Quite a bit different than the Left of a week ago.
Scott:
I think you deserve the credit for showing the initiative to make the phone call and attempting to settle this question. But I would have to agree with John Lilyea that the letter to you was a form letter, at least in part, as suggested by the following email reply at another blog which is posted presumably with an earlier time stamp some time the previous day. We have to make some assumptions about time zones, and you can judge whether the response to you came first. Nevertheless, your post to Newsvine, came after an email that was already posted elsewhere suggesting the response was already formulated before you contacted them. You can find it here.
Having said that, however, there is a difference between the email you posted and the one posted before yours which may indeed reflect a personal response to your question about whether A-L felt snubbed. (or it may also be a form response)
The new President’s absence was understandable considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the necessary attendant security measures. The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or “snubbed.”
That part is added to the form letter.
In any event, I'm not convinced their response is anything more than their effort not to piss people off unnecessarily...Biden did show up, so what could they say? Naturally, they're glad the VP showed up. Your point, and theirs, about the "logistical challenges" and security, etc. sounds like a bunch of PR spin unless someone can come up with a plausible reason why securing a venue where the VP shows up requires less effort than for the Pres. I can see it now:
Pres: secure outer perimeter, 16 floors, main corridors, ballroom exit, entry ways, all bathrooms
VP: secure half-outer perimeter, 10 floors, three corridors, ballroom entrances, 70% of bathrooms.
Bottom line(s): Let's put it this way.
(1) if Obama wanted to go, no one would be able to keep him away!
(2) whether the A-L says they didn't feel "snubbed" or not, they were snubbed by Obama.
If you invite me to a party, and I decide not to go, then I've snubbed you whether you care about it or not.
Obama is the FIRST president not to attend this symbolically significant occasion. Whether it was an oversight or deliberate, it was a bad move. Oops.
Incred:
Good reply. If I may add ....
Despite the loud a-hootin' and a-hollarin' on the other thread, I haven't the slightest doubt that both scott's and robertlyn's documents are genuinely reflective of the Legion's approch at the time the communications were presumably made. The earlier, with the manipulative and menacing tone, was an attempt to extort Obama into attending; the latter, conciliatory tone, after Obama refused to be blackmailed, was an attempt to make sure that they remained viable for WH access.
Therefore, I disagree about the snub being a bad move. Since the AL is at bottom a political organization (despite whatever the technicalities of tax law say)--basically the central organizing institution for right-wing jingoism--I would no more expect Obama to reward them with his presence than I would if the Heritage Foundation sponsored a ball and invited Obama. If the AL is willing to play "ball" (pun intended) for the next four years, maybe Obama will attend in 2012. Otherwise, screw 'em.
jfx,
Since the AL is at bottom a political organization ...
I won't assume the MoH recipients, living and dead, are being exploited by the AL for political advantage. The fact remains that they are bona fide American heroes to whom the highest appreciation of their country has been bestowed. The Commander in Chief should have showed up, even if were merely conventional or obligatory. Is Obama truly the first not to have done so since Ike?
Otherwise, screw 'em.
He's only screwing himself and the MoH honorees, especially as his wife's campaign utterance "For the first time in my adult life..." still sticks in the craw (but not of liberals?).
Anyway, any disappointment by the MoH will be tempered by the Veep's presence, but still...Obama screwed up.
Incred:
Is Obama truly the first not to have done so since Ike?
Yes.
I won't assume the MoH recipients, living and dead, are being exploited by the AL for political advantage.
I will.
Don't mean to be terse, but I expanded on this subject over on Colonel Jack Jacobs' new article and I don't feel like doing it all over again.
Don't mean to be terse, but I expanded on this subject over on Colonel Jack Jacobs' new article and I don't feel like doing it all over again.
ok, jfx, my response is over there as well.
Here's a question you could have asked: Why hasn't the American Legion published pictures and a story on their website? It seems a huge event of more than 1200 people would have garnished some publicity on the AL's web presence, wouldn't you think? Then we could have avoided the whole email exchange/verification process. It's a perfectly legitimate question - the truthful answer to that question would require more than a few phone calls and emails, by the way.
I'm sorry if I'm not very subtle - twenty years as an infantry sergeant tends to make people more direct.
I don't need to answer the "form letter" question, because before you got your email, someone posted a reasonable duplicate of it in my comments - of course, you were too busy patting yourself on the back to bother reading through the entire original discussion before you proudly posted a link to this thread FOUR TIMES on my blog. Even though I took the time to read through the discussion here before I posted - but then I'm not arrogant.
The line "as an organization" tells me that there are quite a few members of the American Legion who felt snubbed, although the organization, realizing they have to work with the new Administration can't afford to feel snubbed. And the reason Mr Roberts used the word "snubbed" is because nearly every blog who linked to my original reporting used the word. Check Technorati. Please don't pretend that you invented the word.
As I wrote in your comment on my blog, which I'm pretty sure you're too arrogant to check, there's much more to this story than just a president not going to a Ball. The answers are out there for anyone interested in the truth. I just can't do it myself at this point for reasons I can't address - this being Washington, DC and all.
Oh, and as far as your snide "unsourced information" - what better source is there than two eye witnesses? Just because you couldn't find the source in a "Google" search doesn't make it unsourced, does it? Oh, excuse me, you're a blogger who recycles news. Let me point out, because you've seemed to have forgotten the first day of J-school - eyewitnesses are the source of nearly every news story.
You keep talking about your blog
As I wrote in your comment on my blog
What blog, where?
I'm having trouble following anything you are saying.
I don't think I'm finding you direct enough.
Oh, *zing* you got me on that one. I don't suppose you want to address the substance of your entire post based on supposition and your stupid feelings, do you? Or do you just want to discuss my not understanding the rules here about posting links (but it's fine if you post your link FOUR TIMES on my blog, huh?)
I've never dealt with a more immature, arrogant, condescending person in my life. You had a lot to say at my blog, you had a lot to say at your blog...and now you're all about enforcing a rule about new posters linking to the subject of the discussion. And it's all because YOUR idiot commenter couldn't find the link.
Piss off. Pound sand. Eat tripe.
I didn't interpret it at all. Read the original post - I only wrote about the facts. My co-blogger didn't interpret it, he merely reported from the event. All of the interpretation is coming from the Left trying to explain it away with their multiple choice answers.
I don't make money from blogging - well, I made thirty dollars last month which I immediately gave to other bloggers. I'm in it to silence the short-sighted and intellectually-stunted Left. You've just joined that number because of your intrusion into a discussion with no facts beyond a form email.
The next time you think you have something to add to the discussion at my blog, email it to me so I don't have to humiliate you in your house like you tried to do to me.
And, oh...grow the hell up.
J.L.,
The only person being humiliated here is yourself. Does acting like a frothing dog usually get people to hear what you have to say and persuade them to your point of view? You may have delusions of journalistic grandeur and ambitions to join FOX news some day but I wouldn't give up my day job if I were you.
Who do I have to persuade? If you're so stupid that you can't see the truth in front of your face, what hope do I have? But there's an unwritten rule of blogging that you treat other bloggers the way you want to be treated. Scotty here showed me how he wanted to be treated on his blog and I'm behaving like he did on my blog, it's not my fault he's been thoroughly cowed into silence. Since I'm on my second career, I have no ambition to work as a journalist - but I still have integrity. Let me know when you find some.
John: The truth, as in the verifiable facts, are that Obama did not attend the ball, citing security reasons, while Joe Biden did. Everything else -- the notion that it was a deliberate snub, the assumption that Obama hates the military, even the assumption that the medal recipients were offended, is all your interpretation and/or pure guess work. Learn the difference, please, between facts and inferences.
Scotty; Yeah, I'm a cyber bully. Remember that the next time you're tempted to challenge me with your supposition and phony polls in my house. If you had to put with the dimwits my co-blogger and I had to deal with over the last few days, you'd be a bully, too.
trex; I never said Obama hates the troops. In fact, in that post I never said a derogatory word about the President. You seem to suffer the same malady as other commenters here - that being the inability to discover the facts of the discussion before shooting off your keyboard. Tell me which security concerns were not present for the VP but would have existed for the President. Please.
Way to scurry in and defend your life partner, though. It's heart warming.
Sorry. I'm already married, but I'm flattered - well, not really, I'm just being nice.
Your PS; What? What does classified material have to do with anything? There's nothing the Secret Service had to do above and beyond their security measures for the Vice President. You're blathering now. I guess you're some kind of pseudo-para-security guru now, huh?
Your whole post was to toot your horn about your phone to call to Mr Roberts and to make up some poll that some goofus supposedly took with the Medal of Honor recipients, despite the fact that I didn't post about the story until the next day when none of the MOH recipients were around to respond to this nebulous poll. Your "source" was blowing smoke up your ass - or you're blowing smoke up up your readers' collective ass.
Just like you tried to blow smoke about the security detail. Give it up, stick boy. The only people who'll believe are the ones who want to believe you. The rest of us have too much common sense. Go back to whatever you were doing before you blogged.
John, am I supposed to be the "life partner" you referenced? ROTFLMAO! Well, Scott, then no one accused you of homosexuality because I'm a woman. I took my screen-name in honor of my mighty Cretaceous namesake Sue in the Chicago Field Museum. For the record, I'm also a very respectable married grandmother, so I am someone's life partner, but definitely not yours. John, I think you get a score of 1.5 out of a possible 10 for deductive reasoning and creative insults here.
OK, here's another reason your whole premise of "security" is wrong; You make reference to a 16-story hotel. There are no 16-story buildings in DC. There's an ordinance in DC that keeps building height below the Capitol Dome - 12 floors is the max. So, I guess that's another way to prove your "research" to be faulty.
Unfortunately President Obama has put forth on a few occasions an anti American attitude, perceived or true he portrays an elitist not in touch with true American values.
From serveral instances of his lack of respect for the National Anthem to the snubbing of those who without their sacrafice this country would not have survived to date. It pains my heart to see it so. I quess in his eyes the rubbing elbows with Hollywood elite is more important than honoring true american hero's. I am saddened to say, I feel the true Obama is showing his colors and its not red, white and blue. We can all only hope my visions are wrong.
Kind of like Bush put forth that he was anti middle class and only cared about large corps and himself.
Rest easy, your visions ARE wrong. They are distortions of perception resulting from listening to too much Limbaugh and believing too many hysterical chain-e-mails. Take a walk in the fresh air, turn of Fox, listen to a few people whose opinions are not exactly the same as your own, and you may start to see the world a bit more realistically.
I dont watch TV news ever, I do read several newspapers. I don't Even have FOX and where I live there is no access to Limbaugh. I do on the other hand find it funny you list them for anyone who does not see things as you do. I have voted for both republican and Democrat and have never missed a vote since my 18th birthday in 1978. I do however read from actual accounts and do see his irreverence to the country. I would ask to say what I have wrote is not the truth. 1) on several occasions did he not refuse to say the national anthem and put his hand over his heart? 2) Did he or did he not go to the ball in question? It was deemed important to all other presidents since its inception. All prior presidents but this one, Democrat OR Republican has attended to pay honor to those who has fought for this country. There is nothing I have said that is not factual but saddening
Re the national anthem, the one thing that's required is to stand (when the anthem is performed live; you don't have to stand up for a recording). Putting your hand over your heart or keeping them respectfully folded is a judgment call. People who circulated that photo claimed, falsely, that Obama was refusing to salute the flag, when in fact he and the other candidates were standing for the national anthem, not the Pledge of Allegiance. Vintage Karl Rove.
Nice piece Brian, After all the filth and low level English being extolled in this article it is refreshing to see someone speak with decency.
I too felt that President Obama should have gone to the MOH ball. Travel time is not a factor for the presidential motorcade. Time to get out and quit our bellyaching and if we really believe what is being said by the conservatives here, GO TO WORK to do something about it in 2010. Yes I am a Vet and am very proud of my service and those that fought with me and continue to fight for our great country. God Bless America.
This is in response to the comment you left on my blog:
The real story is that he did not go. As a veteran, and a former Legion District Commander and graduate of the Legion College in 2002, I have met and appreciate Craig Roberts and the fine work the Legion does.
However, there is no excuse For Mr. Obama's failure to go. None.
Here's your sign: "WE ARE AT WAR." The president made a bad choice this time much like the other times he's slighted the military.
Joe Biden is not the President, nor is he Commander and Chief and when you combine Mr. Obama's slight of the most heroic living Americans today with his past slights, no amount of spin can fix that.
The likely reason Mr. Obama did not attend is that he, most likely, did not feel it important enough to make the effort... just like when he blew off the wounded warriors in Landshtul so he could go shoot hoops.
The undeniable, unspinnable fact is that even Bill Clinton, hardly the Military's best friend, found a way to attend. And had Mr. Obama been so inclined, he, too, would have made it happen.
And no amount of spin or eyewash can change that.
The likely reason Mr. Obama did not attend is that he, most likely, did not feel it important enough to make the effort... just like when he blew off the wounded warriors in Landshtul so he could go shoot hoops.
It would be just as 'likely' that as your second illustration at Landshtul has long been dismissed as a discredited invention to feed the maws of indignation of which you are part.
It is glaringly obvious, tediously obvious that you have no interest in any reality that jars with your finely tuned outrage thus the fact that Landshtul were shown to have requested the visit not take place escapes you because it doesn't fuel your indignation.
In order to maintain your disgust you must of course use your imagination. This you do most predictably. You say 'The likely reason' and 'most likely' , both absolute spin, neither based on anything other than your opinion and as such by definition no more 'likely' than any other singular opinion in the world. One final convulsive use of the imagination straight after where having set up with 'likely' and most likely' you launch yourself into the mind of another individual
"did not feel [emphasis mine] it important enough to make the effort."
So quite matter of factly you set yourself up as a mindreader.
Normally in a post like this I'd ask myself, 'Should I allow myself to enjoy making this person angry?'
In your case I doubt you are ever not angry enough for it to matter.
I mean that German intensive care hospital, to still be finding that personally useful after all that's been written about it? [not just all that suited you and the rest must be lies]
It's a little sad really.
Kinda living breathing, 'Ill thought but passionately scornful kneejerk reaction template #257'
Is that all it takes for you to feel scornful and superiour? a politically inspired fiction since disproven regarding a hospital and your own abilities as a telepathic?
Lordy! Can you be gullible and deceive yourself at the same time?
It seems so.
(Scott grabs popcorn, it's always fun to watch Winsome getting snarky. Makes mental note to mention Winsome during interview I'm publishing tomorrow about David Denby's book Snark. I took the pro-snark position for the interview)
He was pestering you at your blog, too? He must be awfully proud of his ONE PHONE CALL to Mr. Roberts if he's pestering everyone. He's going to be mighty busy, though; over seventy blogs linked to my original post.
Arn't you proud of youself John.
Oh here's some tripe for you
not refuse to say the national anthem
That is totall bull@!$%# and you know it and just use old rwr to pound your ego. Not worth the time and effort to explain it to you again. Just like the old flag pin that even old mccain didn't always wear until the rwr nutwackers make a big deal out of it but I bet you even have one pinned to your jockstrap.
Why no write Obama and ask him directly out why he didn't go.
Personally, I believe the email sent by the AL to Scott. robertlyn's documents is pure farce.
WTF language is that?
I knew you had trouble following the English language just like following anything that you have been given containing facts. You invent your own to fluff youself up.
Veryyyyyyyy intresting are you.
The bully pretender
Your childish and silly behavior is so similiar to my granddaugher's behavior it makes me laugh.
Scott,thanks a bunch for the info,I guess I was acting like a DEMOCRAT,and blaming the President after hearing them complain for all these years puting the blame on Pres. Bush right or wrong I was getting one in early for my side Bill
Scott,thanks for the info,I guess after hearing the democrats complaining about President Bush for everything that happened in the entire world,I wanted to get my shot in early,By the way he is going to be traveling all over the world in the next four years,If he really wanted to go he would have.thanks for giving me equal time. Bill
It would be just as 'likely' that as your second illustration at Landshtul has long been dismissed as a discredited invention to feed the maws of indignation of which you are part.
In a world wehere gliitering generalities rule, you take the cake.
You've made this rather moronic assertion, now feel free to back it up? Who has "discredited" this fact that isn't on Kos, moveon, or Huffington?
If you're going to make such an idiotic claim, then perhaps you might want to back it up.
It is glaringly obvious, tediously obvious that you have no interest in any reality that jars with your finely tuned outrage thus the fact that Landshtul were shown to have requested the visit not take place escapes you because it doesn't fuel your indignation.
It is glaringly obvious, tediously obvious that you have no interest in any reality. Period.
The "request" (actually, the order) was that, as a Senator, OF COURSE Mr. Obama could visit the troops at Landshtul. HE JUST COULDN'T MAKE A CAMPAIGN EVENT OUT OF IT.
So, he decided he'd rather play basketball. Bully for him.
In order to maintain your disgust you must of course use your imagination.
Nah... his continuing slights against the Military, his appointments to his cabinet of liars and criminals, his moronic redistribution of wealth... those types of things make it easy, with no imagination required. Since you asked.
This you do most predictably. You say 'The likely reason' and 'most likely' , both absolute spin, neither based on anything other than your opinion and as such by definition no more 'likely' than any other singular opinion in the world.
Kind of like your bogus, weak, and lying response, you mean? As "predictable" as that?
I used the phrases "the likely reason" and "most likely" BECAUSE THAT IS PRECISELY THE TYPE OF PHRASE THAT SCOTT USED, as in:
"...have found out also that the likely reason that Barack Obama attended the auxiliary balls that he did is because six of the balls that he attended were held in the same building. Therefore, attending those balls and the others that he attended were the most efficient with regards to security."
Besides the basic nonsense of that conclusion (You mean that Biden has security different than Obama? That it's OK to put Biden at some "risk" but not Obama? Please.) one wonders, did you moronically go after Scott for HIS use of the term?
Of course not. You're obviously a leftist, and by definition, that means you're a hypocrite with a double standard. Can't hold someone you agree with to the same standard as someone opposing you, can we? Why that simply isn't done!
One final convulsive use of the imagination straight after where having set up with 'likely' and most likely' you launch yourself into the mind of another individual
Precisely like Scott did? By all means, provide me with a link where you attempted to rip a strip off of him FOR DOING THE SAME THING.
"did not feel [emphasis mine] it important enough to make the effort."
So quite matter of factly you set yourself up as a mindreader.
In reality (Something clearly designed to be beyond your grasp) using facts to arrive at a conclusion doesn't require "mind reading." In this case, it requires reading comprehension, historical accuracy and the ability to analyze, all lacking in the typical self-deluding victim of Bush Derrangement Syndrome such as yourself.
The undeniable, inescapable FACT of the matter is this: Had Obama WANTED TO GO, HE WOULD HAVE GONE. And nothing you nor Scott has provided, once you get past the smoke and mirrors of it, changes that one wit.
Normally in a post like this I'd ask myself, 'Should I allow myself to enjoy making this person angry?'
@!$%#slapping you like a 6 year old has been kind of a hoot. But my "anger?"
"Pity." Go look it up.
In your case I doubt you are ever not angry enough for it to matter.
Good God, the hypocrisy of the left absolutely knows no bounds. First, an idiot trys (and, admittedly, fails; abysmally) to get on my case about "mindreading," and then, within a very few lines, he does the SAME THING he condemns ME for.
Yup. Pity is the word. But I get that you can't help your pathological hypocrisy; after all, as I pointed out, it comes with the leftist territory.
I mean that German intensive care hospital, to still be finding that personally useful after all that's been written about it? [not just all that suited you and the rest must be lies]
Lord, give me patience with idiots.
Landstuhl is an AMERICAN ARMY HOSPITAL that just happens to be IN Germany.
The problem with your moronic take is that soldiers remember. We remember being compared to Nazi's by that asshat Durbin on the floor of the Senate. We remember being called "murderers" by that waste of skin Murtha. We remember Reid telling us that we'd already lost the war and could not win it before the surge.
We have to remember. We have to remember because we put ourlives on the line for scum like you. And if the last thing said was all we hung on to, we'd just say the hell with it... let these scumbags fight their own battles.
"After all that's been written about it" doesn't change it. Obama shares YOUR attitude. And that makes hima worthless scumbag as a Commander in Chief.
Since you asked.
It's a little sad really.
Your positions, take and spin are more than a "little" sad. So, I thought I'd take the opportunity to beat your worthless positions to a pulp, just to keep the record straight.
Kinda living breathing, 'Ill thought but passionately scornful kneejerk reaction template #257'
However you choose to characterize your worthless effort is up to you, but I do understand that self-criticism is often the harshest. There IS help out there for you, if you're willing to look for it, find it and accept it. You don't HAVE to be a mindless cretin.
Is that all it takes for you to feel scornful and superiour? a politically inspired fiction since disproven regarding a hospital and your own abilities as a telepathic?
I get the you follow the Goebbelian line of telling a lie often enough and loud enough for it to become the truth. I really do get that. After all, it's the kind of crap Obama used to get elected, so why wouldn't you?
But again, you reeking hypocrisy about reading MY mind IS a bit over the edge, don't you think?
Lordy! Can you be gullible and deceive yourself at the same time?
Apparently, people can be. You've pulled it off brilliantly.
Thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts that lack any sharp edges so you don't hurt yourself, but feel free to come on back here for additional ass-kicking, whenever you need it.
Can you say with a straight face that if Obama HAD visited Landstuhl you wouldn't have flayed him alive for daring to use Our Brave Troops for political purposes? Of course you would. McCain was ready with a TV commercial saying exactly that, in case Obama did go, as well as one attacking him for snubbing them if he didn't. But then McCain must have been seething that after he'd ridiculed Obama for weeks for not going to Iraq, Obama took up the challenge and went, depriving McCain of one of his precious few talking points.
You will interpret anything he does, no matter what he does, as "anti military." And you will do this because that's what you do, it's all you know. You used it against the Clintons, you will use it against Obama, and you will never understand why people don't take you seriously.
wow, a point by pointer.
All your rebuttal consists again of supposition and distraction overlayed with the same brittle ineffective superority. You miss the whole 'likely' sarcasm and in doing so use it to accuse me of confusing opinion with fact as I did you. and then it goes downhill from there.
Scott was doing it too? Scott did it first? do you realise how childish that sounds?
My worthless positions? quick, run and check. I didn't have any. but you go right ahead and pretend I did if it suits you.
At least you eventually came up with the fact of the matter and i agree, He was invited, he didn't go. Being the most powerful guy on the planet he could have but he didn't.
His priorities differ and were maybe a little more complex than you need to paint him as a dirty snubber.
Why don't you jump into his head and find out what they are?
Oh that's right you already have.
While you may intimidate some with your bluster I'm simply not effected by insults ill conceived, founded on your limitless scorn and missplaced confidence in the construction of argument.
Again, you can't refute stuff with opinion. You can't refute stuff by distraction and you can't refute anything simply with the power of your opinionated arrogance.
save that stuff for the dining table.
Can you say with a straight face that if Obama HAD visited Landstuhl you wouldn't have flayed him alive for daring to use Our Brave Troops for political purposes?
Sigh.
So much ignorance... so little time.
WHILE THERE (And he actually DID go there) had he chosen to go in and meet the wounded WITHOUT making this a campaign event, NO ONE WOULD HAVE HAD ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT, INCLUDING ME.
The ENTIRE point of the exercise is that Mr. Obama, who had the OPPORTUNITY to go in and meet with the troops, INSTEAD chose to go shoot hoops.
Our wounded soldiers should NEVER be a "campaign" exercise. That Obama couldn't figure that out is almost as scary as the tonedeafness he's shown about the most important people in the entirety of our government: the sons and daughters that routinely do EVERY DAY what Obama has NEVER done: put their asses on the line for US.
Odd, isn't it, how important that was when Kerry was running and how unimportant it suddenly became when Obama ran. But then, as I pointed out, hypocrisy abounds on the left.
SInce you asked.
Of course you would.
Gee. I guess you are, well, wrong.
McCain was ready with a TV commercial saying exactly that, in case Obama did go, as well as one attacking him for snubbing them if he didn't.
As I pointed out, our wounded should NEVER BE USED FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.
Had Obama gone in to make points with the public using the mangled bodies of our troops to do so, he would have deserved even more scorn and disrespect over this issue then he does now.
OBAMA is the one who TRIED to make political hay out of the blood of our children. HE COULD have gone in to meet with these people WITHOUT making it a campaign commercial: OBAMA CHOSE NOT TO.
That you see that as "OK" is just another symptom of the left.
Again, since you asked.
But then McCain must have been seething that after he'd ridiculed Obama for weeks for not going to Iraq, Obama took up the challenge and went, depriving McCain of one of his precious few talking points.
Will you leftists make up your minds?
I've been attacked here by a leftist for mindreading, yet both my attacker AND you have no problem doing the same thing.
See, it doesn't concern you that an empty suit playing a senator on TV had SOOOO much to say about Iraq...BUT HAD NEVER SET FOOT IN TYHE COUNTRY... AND THEN TRIED TO INTERFERE WITH FOREIGN POLICY WHEN HE DID GO.
You will interpret anything he does, no matter what he does, as "anti military."
Gee... thank you so much for reading my mind, again. But you'd better be careful... Losesomecowboy might throw a hissy fit against YOUR post for the mindreading bit.
But tell me, please: how can I continue to nail Obama... if he stops giving me a hammer?
On your watch, no matter what he does to us, you'll be dancing around him like the yap dog dancing around Spike, saying "atta boy, Spike... great job!"
It is ENTIRELY possible that this man will hurt the military, just like Reid, Pelosi, Murtha and that idiot Durbin hurt the military... or should those clowns be congratulated for their morale-crushing remarks?
And when he DOES hurt the military, are you one of those that will dutifully and ignorantly attack anyone calling him on it?
Not a lot of diversity of thought in your world, is there?
And you will do this because that's what you do, it's all you know. You used it against the Clintons, you will use it against Obama, and you will never understand why people don't take you seriously.
The truth hurts, but it's still the truth. And no one here, including you, have pointed out where anything I've written is untrue... you two just want me to stop writing it.
As for being "taken seriously?"
Well, YOU took me "seriously" enough to come in here so I could crush your nonsensical position. So, obviously, YOU "took em seriously."
So, you win today's statement of the oxymoron.
CCP: You're right, I shouldn't be dignifying you with attention. But Obama decided not to visit the hospital because the hospital administrators asked him not to. They didn't want to appear to be endorsing any candidate in the upcoming election, and were afraid that any visit, with or without cameras, would convey that impression, and Obama abided by their judgment.
trex:
because the hospital administrators asked him not to
what the...you just pull this outta your, er, hat or what? Here's what happened. No hospital canceled no nuthin!
Don't you believe your own president when he said:
I was going to be accompanied by one of my advisors, a former military officer."
He canceled the visit because if one of his campaign advisors (in fact, retired Major General Jonathan S. Gration) who was not part of the Senate staff went along, it would be perceived as political. So leave the poor guy in the hotel room! Instead, they canceled.
N.B. Instead of visiting the troops without Gration which he could easily have done as a U.S. Senator (and actually they could have left his entire political staff at the side of the road, making an even bigger point of his concern for the troops), they canceled the visit. Instead, he played hoops, got some exercise and rested up for the big crowds in Germany.
Open your eyes.
Scott:
The role of Gration was whatever it was and is subject to speculation, but Obama could have visited the troops without him. Besides, your idea suggests there is more value in a visit that never took place than in a visit that could have taken place albeit without Obama's adviser along.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |