Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Scott Isaacs's column >>

SCOTT ISAACS

Transplanted Kentuckian living in Ohio - GO BIG BLUE!
Articles Posted: 268  Links Seeded: 2160
Member Since: 6/2007  Last Seen: 12/24/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Obama Blows Off Medal of Honor Recipients... Not Exactly

Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:10 AM EST
politics, barack-obama, military, president, soldiers, ball, aol, portfolio, medal-of-honor, inaugural, elitist, offend, blow-off
By Scott Isaacs

Live Poll

Do you still think Barack Obama snubbed retired soldiers?

View Results
  • 32063
    Yes
    59%
  • 32064
    No
    41%

VoteTotal Votes: 2664

Advertise | AdChoices

Upon reading a Newsvine user's seed of a blog that used unsourced information that said the following:

According to TSO who was at the "Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball", this newly sworn-in President for the first time in 56 years blew off the ball (that's 14 Inaugurations).

Some background on the ball;

The American Legion sponsors the ball, which recognizes recipients of Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military award. It started in 1953 for President Dwight D. Eisenhower's first inauguration.

Event co-sponsors include 13 other veterans service organizations, among them the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the Paralyzed Veterans of America.

So where was our new President instead of honoring Medal of Honor recipients who by some miracle are still alive? According to Huffington Post, this was his schedule for Inaugural celebrations;

Later that day, the Presidential Inaugural Committee will host 10 official inaugural balls:

— Neighborhood Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.

— Obama Home States (Illinois and Hawaii) Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.

— Biden Home States (Pennsylvania and Delaware) Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.

— Midwest Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.

— Mid-Atlantic Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.

— Western Inaugural Ball at the Washington Convention Center.

— Commander in Chief's Ball at the National Building Museum.

— Southern Inaugural Ball at the National Guard Armory.

— Eastern Inaugural Ball at Union Station.

— Youth Inaugural Ball at the Washington Hilton.

Unofficial balls include:

— Congressional Black Caucus Inaugural Ball at the Capitol Hilton.

— Creative Coalition Inaugural Ball at the Harman Center for the Arts.

— Recording Industry Association of America's ball for Feeding America.

— BET's Inaugural Ball at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel.

— Africa on the Potomac inaugural celebration at Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Va.

— American Music Inaugural Ball at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel.

— Inaugural Purple Ball at the Fairmont Hotel.

— Human Rights Campaign's Equality Ball at the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel.

— Inaugural Peace Ball at the Smithsonian National Postal Museum.

— Impact Film Fund ball.

Mr. Wolf from Blackfive sends along this link to which Inaugural Balls Obama actually attended last night.

Source

Blackfive, which I read occasionally for military pieces, confirmed that President Obama did not come to the inaugural ball. So I became curious because the only two sources were two blogs and one source that consisted of initials. Therefore, I did what any rational person would do: I contacted the American Legion to get the straight story from the people who would know. I was put in contact with a very pleasant gentleman named Craig Roberts who is the American Legion's Media Relations Manager and after our conversation he e-mailed me this statement which I will include in its entirety:

In answer to your inquiry:

The American Legion, as it has on every inauguration evening since 1953, hosted the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball on January 20th. The quadrennial event is co-sponsored with fourteen veterans service and military service organizations and honors recipients of the Medal of Honor. Forty-seven of these heroes attended this year's event which was held in the Renaissance Washington DC Hotel.

President Obama was invited but did not attend. Vice-President Joe Biden did appear, however, and was very warmly received. The new President's absence was understandable considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the necessary attendant security measures. The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or "snubbed."

Thank you,

Craig Roberts

Media Relations Manager

The American Legion

1608 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006

202.263.2982 (direct)

First of all, I would like to thank Mr. Roberts for taking my call and taking the time to compose this statement so that I can share it on behalf of the American Legion. So to those fellow Obama supporters that think this ball did not happen, it did. It was omitted from the media outlets it was omitted from because of logistical challenges due to the extraordinary number of people that flooded Washington D.C. to see Barack Obama be inaugurated as the 44th president and it is not yet on the American Legion's website (as I type this at 8:30 A.M. on 1-23-09) because of some difficulties in updating the website. However, there will be media coverage of the event forthcoming.

I have found out also that the likely reason that Barack Obama attended the auxiliary balls that he did is because six of the balls that he attended were held in the same building. Therefore, attending those balls and the others that he attended were the most efficient with regards to security. It is no secret that President Obama has had questions surrounding his security, that is evident by observing that he was the earliest presidential candidate ever to get a security detail. If the Secret Service felt it prudent to guard him so early in the campaign can the reader imagine what the Secret Service feels is prudent now that he is the President of the United States?

The most likely reason that President Obama did not go to the "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball is because it was held in the Renaissance Hotel which consists of 16 floors. There was an event called the "Illinois Party - Presidential Event" held at the Renaissance the night before that the then-President-elect did not attend either (I have a call in to the President's press office asking for confirmation of this information which was given to me by one of my sources for this story). Given the amount of time and resources it would have taken to clear a 16 floor hotel as well as protect it while President Obama was inside, I can only guess that he was advised by his Presidential Protection Detail not to attend either inaugural ball because of the building and the inherent problems in securing and then protecting it. The sheer number of people crowding the streets and staying in the hotel surely presented a formidable screening problem as well. But, there's your story... it's not as sexy as "Barack Obama Hates The Military" but it is the truth as best I can tell after talking to the organization responsible for hosting the event and doing some research and educated guesswork about why a security team wouldn't want to protect a principal in the Renaissance with more than 2 million extra people in Washington D.C.

Update: It would appear that, according to Stars & Stripes that Obama had some Medal of Honor recipients at an inaugural ball that he attended. This gives the number of living Medal of Honor recipients as 99, but I believe that two have passed away since that number was compiled leaving 97. There are 7 in this picture and there were 47 at the American Legion inaugural event. I'm curious if there were more at the event this photo was taken at.

Further update: I received an e-mail from Mr. Roberts today (which I would have gotten yesterday if I had not miscommunicated my e-mail address to him) with his original statement along with a new statement. I will include both statements in their entirety:

My statement on behalf of our National Adjutant, Dan Wheeler:

"The American Legion, as it has on every inauguration evening since
1953, hosted the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball on January
20th . The quadrennial event is co-sponsored by fourteen veterans
service and military service organizations and honors recipients of the
Medal of Honor. Forty-seven of these heroes attended this year's event.
President Obama was invited but did not attend. Vice-President Joe Biden
did appear, however, and was very warmly received. From The American
Legion's point of view, the new President's absence was understandable
considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the
vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the
necessary attendant security measures. The National Adjutant of The
American Legion states that, as an organization, The Legion does not
feel offended or "snubbed" by the President's failure to appear."

Mr. Wheeler's message as of noon today (January 26):

"We extended an invitation as we always do. There are numerous Balls
and we know he can't attend them all. Of course, we would have loved
for him to make an appearance, but he didn't. It's a logistical
nightmare. He did meet with the troops at the Commander In Chief's
Ball, and we are grateful for that. Our Ball wasn't about the
President; it was about the Medal of Honor recipients and the veterans
and families who were there. We are grateful that the Vice President
appeared, and our guests were very appreciative.

"That having been said, there are much more important issues to dwell
on, which we intend to do. We look forward to working with the new
administration on ensuring full and guaranteed funding for VA health
care services, and the very best treatment for our service people who
have been wounded, and on the quality of life of all members of the
Armed Forces and their families, as well as the maintenance of a
national security force that will deter any enemy from considering an
attack on America."

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Scott Isaacs's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: 2008: Barack Obama, America's Need For Change, Bar Room Debates, Centervine, DemGuys, Democrats, Election News, Enraged, Gut Check America, Heated Debate, Journalism on Newsvine, Left of Center, Newsvine Election Coverage, Newsviners' Picks, ObamaExpress, ObamaVine, Open Mic, Political Analysis, Politics in USA, The Big 2008 Election, The Bigger 2008 Election , The Truth about Barack Obama, The War Room, To MSNBC, US News and Views , Veterans & Friends
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (310)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
agio

This is a good article, but please consider reformatting it, as it's kind of hard to tell your prose from the quoted material.

  • 2 votes
#1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:47 AM EST
Scott Isaacs

Sorry about the tags... I'm in the midst of attempting to fix them.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:53 AM EST
Scott Isaacs

Finally fixed agio. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:59 AM EST
Simplistic Reality

Just sounds to me that Obama made a good excuse on why he couldn't attend.... dosen't change the fact of the matter though.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:11 AM EST
Scott Isaacs

SR:

Define the "fact" you speak of that doesn't change.

  • 7 votes
#1.4 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:31 AM EST
Carloz

Excellent article, Scott! Thanks for taking all that trouble. When I first read the headline of the other story I doubted it, especially because of the use of the term "blow off," which just sounded like more grist for the internet rumor mill. Thanks for verifying that gut reaction. Cheers, Carloz (formerly Gipper1)

  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:55 PM EST
trex-138069

Scott: The "fact" is that the sore losers want an excuse to dust off their favorite smears from the Clinton era, and one of them is that the President "hates the military." His speech at the CinC ball doesn't count for anything, therefore, as long as they can find one event he didn't attend.

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:14 PM EST
Scott (Scoop) Butki

Scott: Great piece. I am so glad to see Newsviners showing initiative and doing real journalism work, i..e. making calls and inquiries.

The more we do things like - in this case contacting Mr. Roberts - the more we can be seen as a real group of people who think for ourselves and do some journalism of our own.

Clipped to Newsviner's Picks. I'm on a campaign this year against lazy thinking and people just seeding other people's stuff without asking questions is high on my list of things we should be above doing.

  • 5 votes
#1.7 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:28 PM EST
Scott Isaacs

Thanks Scott. I'd like to see more progress in this direction myself. Seeding is fine but I think that content creation should be robust here.

  • 6 votes
#1.8 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:06 PM EST
Scott (Scoop) Butki

The more original articles the better as far as i'm concerned.

  • 4 votes
#1.9 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:12 AM EST
redacted-

Meta?

  • 2 votes
#1.10 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 8:19 PM EST
Scott Isaacs

Bill:

Well, yeah, it did kinda evolve into that. At least it was one thread rather than the actual article.

  • 1 vote
#1.11 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 8:55 PM EST
Ranger65

No excuse for a Commander in Chief. It shows his lack of respect for the military due to the fact that he is a coward and a liberal POS. That's just my opinion. He should NOT be the President of this country and the fact he is shows us where we are headed.

  • 1 vote
#1.12 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:11 PM EST
winsomecowboy

a liberal POS

What an exemplary american and human being you are. I'm sure whatever God you so fervently adore considers you perhaps not as qualified to throw stones as you do.

  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:22 PM EST
Scott Isaacs

Well, at least Ranger has come around to realizing that everything he speaks isn't fact and that some is opinion.

  • 1 vote
#1.14 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:26 PM EST
winsomecowboy

That is a good thing and fair enough too all in all. I always thought that was something most Americans shared, right and left and middle, a certain grudging tolerance of the extremes as the price of freedom.

Now people seem to barracade themselves behind a convenient label and secretly wish all the other labels were exterminated.

Sad really, used to be quite an tolerant country.

  • 1 vote
#1.15 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:35 PM EST
KMarx

Ranger

He should NOT be the President of this country and the fact he is shows us where we are headed.

I suppose you think we were headed tn the right direction with jackass junior in office?

    #1.16 - Tue Feb 3, 2009 8:25 PM EST
    jdgarrish

    The President is our Commander and Chief of the military. To not show up at a function honoring the bravest of the brave is not acceptable. Other Presidents made the effort to attend so why excuses for this one???

      #1.17 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:43 PM EST
      Scott Isaacs

      jdgarrish:

      So are you saying the "bravest of the brave" weren't also at the CinC ball even though there were seven MoH recipients there? The American Legion's ball didn't have a lock on MoH recipients.

      • 1 vote
      #1.18 - Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:05 PM EST
      Reply
      SpoxLogic

      Thank you for the reserarch, Scott.  Amazing what one can find out when one takes the time and effort to get information.  I started questioning when I Googled "Medal of Honor Inaugural Ball" and the only hits were from posts made after Jan 20, 2009.  That made me think that there was no such thing.  And I was right - as your piece points out, the event is called "Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball".

      Also, the logistics probably prevented him from going - but he didn't snub them since he sent the VPOTUS.  That shows that he knew about it and wanted his administration represented.

      Alas, Obama's detractors will never let something like the truth get in their way, I guess.

      • 13 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:27 AM EST
      Agent 57

      Plus the lack of any mention in any of the media information about the ball, not listed on any of the releases ...

      nice job Scott.....

      • 7 votes
      #2.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:40 AM EST
      Scott Isaacs

      Agent 57:

      I was glad I was able to talk to Mr. Roberts and that he took the time out of his day to tell me about the event, that Biden came, etc. It helped me understand enough to write this article accurately in addition to his official statement on behalf of the American Legion. So a big thank you to him and to everyone that takes the time to read it.

      • 10 votes
      #2.2 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:04 AM EST
      Bill Harrison

      Scott, if it's alright with the Legion it's alright by me. Inevitably somebody or group of somebodies gets their noses bent out of joint during an inaugural. Any number of ticket holders for the swearing-in ceremony never made it through the 3rd Street Tunnel to get in. Considering the number of people who swarmed into town last week, I think those of us who call the DC area home can be proud of the region's handling of the inauguration.

      • 7 votes
      #2.3 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:23 PM EST
      Scott Isaacs

      Bill:

      I thought it went off remarkably well from my observation in Ohio. If I'm not mistaken that's the most people there at one time ever, wasn't it? I'm surprised that there weren't more problems. Plus I imagine security was as tight as ever given the foreign AND domestic interest in killing the President at the inauguration. I could see why six of the inaugural balls he attended were in the same building: don't switch venues, less chances for error. Secret Service has to succeed 100% of the time and our enemies only once.

      • 6 votes
      #2.4 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:43 PM EST
      Bill Harrison

      I think so.

      • 5 votes
      #2.5 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:51 PM EST
      trex-138069

      One of my colleagues was in D.C. with her church group. She told me they couldn't see much, and the cold was excruciating, but they figured that if people in the past could suffer through fire-hoses and police dogs, they could suffer through a little cold to be part of a joyous moment in history. Anyway, she also described how people were climbing trees and climbing on top of port-a-johns to get better views, and the Park police were having the devil's own time making them stop it before anyone got hurt. Considering how easily even a happy crowd can get out of control, I think everyone in charge of keeping the inauguration orderly can take a very well deserved bow. It was a glorious occasion.

      • 4 votes
      #2.6 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:44 PM EST
      amazed-839412

      According to your list, he was in the same hotel as the veteran's ball. It's amazing how some people will let him off the hook regardless of what he does. You assume it was due to security and then say others will never accept the truth. It seems the truth is whatever you want it to be.

        #2.7 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:24 PM EST
        Scott Isaacs

        amazed:

        There are two different Renaissance hotels in Washington D.C., wiseass. He was at the one that isn't 16 stories. This further contributed to the confusion in the MSM.

        • 4 votes
        #2.8 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:21 AM EST
        santav-6693

        No need to be nasty. The individual didn't know about the two Renaissance hotels. A simple explanation would have been sufficient. I don't buy your explanation either about the security and the hotel. Security or not he should have made an appearance.... after all it was and seems to be a tradition. More importantly, it was to honor our boys who gave more than their lives to protect us. To heck with the Hollywood crowd. Roberts was only being polite, covering his butt so to speak. You don't really think he would come out against the President in writing? You can't be that naive.

          #2.9 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 5:17 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          santav:

          Nobody I talked to for this story, anonymous or named, came out against the President. That speaks to a level of rationalization that some people appear to be unable to achieve.

          • 2 votes
          #2.10 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 2:56 PM EST
          Reply
          jfxgillis

          Scott:

          Most excellent!

          • 9 votes
          Reply#3 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:43 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          Thank you Jack, coming from a writer of your caliber it means a great deal. :-)

          • 9 votes
          #3.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:56 AM EST
          Reply
          Blearc

          Scott thanks for your research.

          • 8 votes
          Reply#4 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:47 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          Thanks Blearc, I was happy to do it. All I ask is that you pass it around to your political friends so that everyone quickly has an answer to this charge and there isn't a major break of trust between veterans and Obama. I wanted to refute it because Obama shouldn't dignify the accusation but someone needs to explain logically why it is improbable to be a slam against military veterans.

          If I thought that Obama was bad for veterans, I never would have voted for him much less worked for him. He'll do right by them, IMHO.

          • 8 votes
          #4.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:59 AM EST
          SpoxLogic

          I think you are right, Scott.  In fact, I think that will be Michelle's personal project while she is in the White House.  She's already shown that she want to do something for our troops and us vets as well.

          • 3 votes
          #4.2 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:07 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          SL:

          I think that Michelle will make her personal project the improvement of the lives of military members and their families as well. I'm not sure where her passion comes from, but I can see how passionate she is about it when she discusses it.

          • 6 votes
          #4.3 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:24 PM EST
          Reply
          winsomecowboy

          Good job clearing this up and spending time going straight to the source and sharing that info Scott. There has been a lot of septic conflict between us over a prolonged period so it's with a measure of humility and shame mixed with pleasure I extend a thank you and respect.

          • 11 votes
          Reply#5 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:10 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          winsome:

          I have been much less than a gentleman to you and I regret that because I don't think you deserved it. I appreciate that you are gracious enough to come here and say the things you have. Thank you for your compliments and your extension of respect. If you agree, I think it is time to leave our quarrels in the past and move forward from here on out.

          • 10 votes
          #5.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:29 PM EST
          Reply
          Division by Zero

          Nicely done, Scott.  I figured there was more to the story.

          • 6 votes
          Reply#6 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:52 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          It didn't sound quite right to me either which spurred me to contact the American Legion. I'm just very pleased with how open the A.L. was to talking to me and dispensing an official statement for me to include in the article.

          • 4 votes
          #6.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:09 AM EST
          Reply
          Johnny Yuma

          Excellent piece and great research.

          • 6 votes
          Reply#7 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:54 AM EST
          jsbach

          It's funny all the people here going "whew!" 

          • 4 votes
          Reply#8 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:57 AM EST
          Scott Isaacs

          I think that it is relief that this is no longer speculation about how the organization involved feels but an official statement from them that largely puts to bed the most volatile parts of the "story." At least, that was why I was relieved when I wrote the story: there's no question where the American Legion as an organization stands now.

          • 4 votes
          #8.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:17 AM EST
          Ranger65

          LOL....What professional public answer do you think they would give you? Do you really think the most honorable men in the world would publicly say; "We are pissed that the CIC did not attend and it is a shameful act against America's warriors. Period. This is beyond partisan this is about our bravest men both Repub. and Demo. it has no bearing whatsoever. It makes me just plain ill. Yeah, they are gentlemen and won't say anything but they know and feel it just as I who is a Purple Heart recipient feels it. Shame on this guy. I think our men and women in uniform come before anyone and I'm sorry, when you snub them it is a sign of the Liberal transformation we are going through. Obama had gays sitting at his table at the inaugeration and he couldn't go honor the men and women of honor? Sorry....that dog don't hunt.

            #8.2 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:24 PM EST
            Scott Isaacs

            You are aware that he honored both MoH recipients and Purple Heart recipients at the CinC ball, right? The only thing that the Salute to Heroes ball has on the CinC ball is a longer track record and more MoH recipients in attendance. If Obama truly doesn't like the military why wouldn't he snub both the CinC AND Salute to Heroes ball? Because that is your base assertion: liberals hate the military and Obama is the chief liberal. Your assertion just doesn't square with reality Ranger. Your opinions don't have to be supported by the facts, but they tend to be much more valued if they are. That's the difference between conjecture and conclusions. You have no rationale why Obama would hate the military nor any facts to support that. You have a simple emotional response based on your own prejudices. It's your right to have that, but it doesn't make it any more true than if I passionately tell you the moon is made of cheese

            Also, if the American Legion is taking the "high road" and being untruthful about its true opinion of why Obama did not come to their ball there is only one reason they would do that: they are your point man on this issue and they want you and people saying what you are saying to drop it. If they aren't going to perpetuate the pissing contest, why should anyone else?

            • 1 vote
            #8.3 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:35 PM EST
            Reply
            jscusmc69

            Job WELL done Scott--I also called AL as Iv been a member there many years and was told basicly the same as you Thanks again.

            • 7 votes
            Reply#9 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:31 PM EST
            Scott Isaacs

            Thanks for reading the story. I'm glad that the American Legion was willing to address it and issue a statement promptly. I can't thank them enough for the access that they allowed me so that I could put their side out to the public.

            • 5 votes
            #9.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:19 AM EST
            Reply
            trex-138069

            Well, I will certainly forward this to Snopes.com. Guess I have to eat my words about my assumption that the whole story was made up out of whole cloth, but obviously the new administration did pay its respects to the event, in the person of Joe Biden, and Obama's absence offended no one except the 45th fighting keyboard brigade. Thanks very much for the research!!

            • 4 votes
            Reply#10 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:49 PM EST
            Scott Isaacs

            I wanted to set an even keel so that both Obama's supporters and detractors would know exactly what the situation was.

            • 3 votes
            #10.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:22 AM EST
            davis4000-2000Deleted
            amazed-839412

            he attended the Comm in Chief ball via satellite. Even Clinton went to the CMH ball. He could rob a bank on national TV and you would say it's an attempt to stimulate the economy.

              #10.3 - Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:34 PM EST
              Scott Isaacs

              amazed:

              Wrong.

              • 2 votes
              #10.4 - Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:52 PM EST
              Reply
              Dave Hunter

              Scott,

              Great job here. Thanks for all your time and perseverance following this up. Nice to be able to put at least one piece of propaganda to bed all due to to your efforts.

              • 6 votes
              Reply#11 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:01 PM EST
              trex-138069

              But you know the people who love these narratives. They'll never EVER give it up.

              • 4 votes
              #11.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:09 PM EST
              Division by Zero

              They'll never EVER give it up.

              I just heard this morning that some folks STILL believe Obama is a Muslim even after the inauguration.

              • 5 votes
              #11.2 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:24 PM EST
              Scott Isaacs

              Dave:

              Thanks. Everything didn't fit together before this so I wanted to find the truth for myself and then share it.

              • 3 votes
              #11.3 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:26 AM EST
              Reply
              jaywow67

              Damm you are all wrong President Obama didn't attend that ball because he was to pissed at all the righties that were there.

              Next time tell them to only bring left hand vets to the ball and he'll be there.

              Thanks Scott for all the effort.  Very much appecitated.

              • 4 votes
              Reply#12 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:59 PM EST
              trex-138069

              Grin! But what about the ambidextrous community, eh?

              • 4 votes
              #12.1 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:01 PM EST
              Reply
              crusader-637277

              Good effort to get at the heart. Well done.

              • 5 votes
              Reply#13 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:07 PM EST
              Scott Isaacs

              Thank you

              • 3 votes
              #13.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:28 AM EST
              Reply
              Cynthia-662620

              Scott, what a bunch of work! And great work too! Thanks.

              • 4 votes
              Reply#14 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:11 PM EST
              Scott Isaacs

              Thank you

              • 3 votes
              #14.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:28 AM EST
              Reply
              bja-836153

              Thank you for your explanation.

              Have your written a comment about this at "This Ain't Hell" () or would you rather just beat your forehead on your desk? Their position on this is obnoxious. Clearly, they have decided it was an intentional snub. Right. The new president is going to snub MOH winners because he's, what, an idiot? Of course, there's no mention on the site that the MOH winners had special invitations and were seated on the podium for the Inauguration itself. Nor is there any mention of how the Tuskeegee airmen were guests of honor as well. 

              • 1 vote
              Reply#15 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:47 PM EST
              Scott Isaacs

              I may yet register and post this but I was hoping someone already registered there would read this and point it out to them.

              • 3 votes
              #15.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:31 AM EST
              Reply
              paddyohea

              I sure hope you don't think this is real journalism. You did not vet your sources nor did you show objectivity. "

              Thanks Blearc, I was happy to do it. All I ask is that you pass it around to your political friends so that everyone quickly has an answer to this charge and there isn't a major break of trust between veterans and Obama. I wanted to refute it because Obama shouldn't dignify the accusation but someone needs to explain logically why it is improbable to be a slam against military veterans.

              If I thought that Obama was bad for veterans, I never would have voted for him much less worked for him. He'll do right by them, IMHO.

              "

              The only thing I hate worse than left -leaning media claiming to be journalist is right leaning press claiming to be "Fair and Balanced"

                Reply#16 - Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:59 PM EST
                Scott Isaacs

                Name a source that I did not vet.

                • 4 votes
                #16.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:33 AM EST
                Reply
                The Frog PrinceDeleted
                Jonn Lilyea

                I draw your attention to this line from the email;

                The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or “snubbed.”

                What does that say to you? I know you think you did a great job here, and everyone is stroking your ego real well because you're writing what they want to read - all because you made a phone call and got the same form email they sent to everyone else who asked.

                I guess we've entered a new age in which the Left doesn't bother to ask questions that might not get them answers they don't want to hear. Quite a bit different than the Left of a week ago.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#18 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:46 PM EST
                Scott Isaacs

                John:

                He is the spokesman for the organization. Whom else do you expect him to speak for?

                What questions did you want me to ask him? I asked him if the American Legion felt offended or snubbed because Vice President Biden came instead of President Obama.

                What proof do you have it was a form letter? Do you think it was a coincidence that I used the word "snubbed" and the word not only ended up in the form letter but ended up in quotes?

                Don't be oblique with your criticisms of "the Left" because you're clearly unskilled at getting your point across subtly. Say what you mean or don't bother.

                • 4 votes
                #18.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:24 PM EST
                The Incredulous One

                Scott:

                I think you deserve the credit for showing the initiative to make the phone call and attempting to settle this question. But I would have to agree with John Lilyea that the letter to you was a form letter, at least in part, as suggested by the following email reply at another blog which is posted presumably with an earlier time stamp some time the previous day. We have to make some assumptions about time zones, and you can judge whether the response to you came first. Nevertheless, your post to Newsvine, came after an email that was already posted elsewhere suggesting the response was already formulated before you contacted them.  You can find it here.

                Having said that, however, there is a difference between the email you posted and the one posted before yours which may indeed reflect a personal response to your question about whether A-L felt snubbed. (or it may also be a form response)

                The new President’s absence was understandable considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the necessary attendant security measures. The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or “snubbed.”

                That part is added to the form letter.

                In any event, I'm not convinced their response is anything more than their effort not to piss people off unnecessarily...Biden did show up, so what could they say? Naturally, they're glad the VP showed up. Your point, and theirs, about the "logistical challenges" and security, etc. sounds like a bunch of PR spin unless someone can come up with a plausible reason why securing a venue where the VP shows up requires less effort than for the Pres. I can see it now:

                Pres: secure outer perimeter, 16 floors, main corridors, ballroom exit, entry ways, all bathrooms

                VP: secure half-outer perimeter, 10 floors, three corridors, ballroom entrances, 70% of bathrooms.

                Bottom line(s): Let's put it this way.

                (1) if Obama wanted to go, no one would be able to keep him away!

                (2) whether the A-L says they didn't feel "snubbed" or not, they were snubbed by Obama.

                If you invite me to a party, and I decide not to go, then I've snubbed you whether you care about it or not.

                Obama is the FIRST president not to attend this symbolically significant occasion. Whether it was an oversight or deliberate, it was a bad move. Oops.

                • 4 votes
                #18.2 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:35 PM EST
                jfxgillis

                Incred:

                Good reply. If I may add ....

                Despite the loud a-hootin' and a-hollarin' on the other thread, I haven't the slightest doubt that both scott's and robertlyn's documents are genuinely reflective of the Legion's approch at the time the communications were presumably made. The earlier, with the manipulative and menacing tone, was an attempt to extort Obama into attending; the latter, conciliatory tone, after Obama refused to be blackmailed, was an attempt to make sure that they remained viable for WH access.

                Therefore, I disagree about the snub being a bad move. Since the AL is at bottom a political organization (despite whatever the technicalities of tax law say)--basically the central organizing institution for right-wing  jingoism--I would no more expect Obama to reward them with his presence than I would if the Heritage Foundation sponsored a ball and invited Obama. If the AL is willing to play "ball" (pun intended) for the next four years, maybe Obama will attend in 2012. Otherwise, screw 'em.

                • 6 votes
                #18.3 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:21 PM EST
                Scott Isaacs

                TIO:

                I agree that the first part of the e-mail was generated for dissemination to people asking about the event. The second part I don't know for sure but after talking to Craig Roberts and phrasing the question with offended or snubbed and the "snubbed" part being in quotations leads me to believe that evolution of the e-mail was created after I spoke with Craig Roberts and that is almost certainly because I came into this on Friday morning at 9 AM and by that point that was what the story had morphed into: was the American Legion offended by the President's absence? Looking at the timeline, it makes sense because it happened late Tuesday night which means the earliest it could have been reported on blogs was Wednesday sometime. That leaves the rest of Wednesday and Thursday for it to be discussed, analyzed, be seeded here at Newsvine, reach my eyes and prompt my call to the American Legion on Friday morning.

                • 3 votes
                #18.4 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:31 PM EST
                The Incredulous One

                jfx,

                Since the AL is at bottom a political organization ...

                I won't assume the MoH recipients, living and dead, are being exploited by the AL for political advantage. The fact remains that they are bona fide American heroes to whom the highest appreciation of their country has been bestowed. The Commander in Chief should have showed up, even if were merely conventional or obligatory. Is Obama truly the first not to have done so since Ike?

                Otherwise, screw 'em.

                He's only screwing himself and the MoH honorees, especially as his wife's campaign utterance "For the first time in my adult life..." still sticks in the craw (but not of liberals?).

                Anyway, any disappointment by the MoH will be tempered by the Veep's presence, but still...Obama screwed up.

                • 1 vote
                #18.5 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:29 PM EST
                jfxgillis

                Incred:

                 Is Obama truly the first not to have done so since Ike?

                Yes.

                I won't assume the MoH recipients, living and dead, are being exploited by the AL for political advantage.

                I will.

                Don't mean to be terse, but I expanded on this subject over on Colonel Jack Jacobs' new article and I don't feel like doing it all over again.

                • 5 votes
                #18.6 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:14 PM EST
                Scott Isaacs

                I would not be surprised if the American Legion was a political group unofficially... there's a reason that Bush went to their convention to give a speech when he was extremely unpopular.

                • 5 votes
                #18.7 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:34 PM EST
                The Incredulous One

                Don't mean to be terse, but I expanded on this subject over on Colonel Jack Jacobs' new article and I don't feel like doing it all over again.

                ok, jfx, my response is over there as well.

                • 2 votes
                #18.8 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:00 AM EST
                Reply
                Jonn Lilyea

                Here's a question you could have asked: Why hasn't the American Legion published pictures and a story on their website? It seems a huge event of more than 1200 people would have garnished some publicity on the AL's web presence, wouldn't you think? Then we could have avoided the whole email exchange/verification process. It's a perfectly legitimate question - the truthful answer to that question would require more than a few phone calls and emails, by the way.

                I'm sorry if I'm not very subtle - twenty years as an infantry sergeant tends to make people  more direct. 

                I don't need to answer the "form letter" question, because before you got your email, someone posted a reasonable duplicate of it in my comments - of course, you were too busy patting yourself on the back to bother reading through the entire original discussion before you proudly posted a link to this thread FOUR TIMES on my blog. Even though I took the time to read through the discussion here before I posted - but then I'm not arrogant.

                The line "as an organization" tells me that there are quite a few members of the American Legion who felt snubbed, although the organization, realizing they have to work with the new Administration can't afford to feel snubbed. And the reason Mr Roberts used the word "snubbed" is because nearly every blog who linked to my original reporting used the word. Check Technorati. Please don't pretend that you invented the word.

                As I wrote in your comment on my blog, which I'm pretty sure you're too arrogant to check, there's much more to this story than just a president not going to a Ball. The answers are out there for anyone interested in the truth. I just can't do it myself at this point for reasons I can't address - this being Washington, DC and all.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#19 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:09 PM EST
                Jonn Lilyea

                Oh, and as far as your snide "unsourced information" - what better source is there than two eye witnesses? Just because you couldn't find the source in a "Google" search doesn't make it unsourced, does it? Oh, excuse me, you're a blogger who recycles news. Let me point out, because you've seemed to have forgotten the first day of J-school -  eyewitnesses are the source of nearly every news story.

                  #20 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:37 PM EST
                  jaywow67

                  You keep talking about your blog

                  As I wrote in your comment on my blog

                  What blog, where?

                  I'm having trouble following anything you are saying.

                  I don't think I'm finding you direct enough.

                  • 1 vote
                  #20.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:04 PM EST
                  Jonn LilyeaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                  That's exactly what I'm talking about. You people are so lazy, you have to be spoon fed every bit of information and you can't do anything for your-damn-selves. The internet has made everything so easy, you can't get out of your own way.

                  Do you think maybe that "my blog" means the blog mentioned in the intial post on this thread?. It's at

                  Is there anything else I can hand carry for you while I'm here? For Pete's sake.

                  It's no wonder you don't recognize real journalism when you read it.

                    #20.2 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:53 PM EST
                    Scott Isaacs

                    Jonn:

                    I suppose you're as inattentive as me since you didn't notice that new users are prevented from posting links.

                    • 3 votes
                    #20.3 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:28 AM EST
                    Jonn Lilyea

                    Oh, *zing* you got me on that one. I don't suppose you want to address the substance of your entire post based on supposition and your stupid feelings, do you? Or do you just want to discuss my not understanding the rules here about posting links (but it's fine if you post your link FOUR TIMES on my blog, huh?)

                    I've never dealt with a more immature, arrogant, condescending person in my life. You had a lot to say at my blog, you had a lot to say at your blog...and now you're all about enforcing a rule about new posters linking to the subject of the discussion. And it's all because YOUR idiot commenter couldn't find the link.

                    Piss off. Pound sand. Eat tripe.

                      #20.4 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:39 AM EST
                      Scott Isaacs

                      Jonn:

                      It's an anti-spam feature and built into the system of Newsvine... which I don't own or administer.

                      You're just like Ann Coulter. You take a fact (Obama didn't attend this particular ball) and then you interpret it in a way that gets you maximum exposure and there's no better way to get attention than to say Obama didn't attend this inaugural ball because he hates the military.

                      So, I suppose that since I defend Obama, I'll see you the next time that you try to make money off his fame. I'd tell you to pound sand but, honestly, that's not how I do things.

                      • 5 votes
                      #20.5 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:33 AM EST
                      Jonn Lilyea

                      I didn't interpret it at all. Read the original post - I only wrote about the facts. My co-blogger didn't interpret it, he merely reported from the event. All of the interpretation is coming from the Left trying to explain it away with their multiple choice answers.

                      I don't make money from blogging - well, I made thirty dollars last month which I immediately gave to other bloggers. I'm in it to silence the short-sighted and intellectually-stunted Left. You've just joined that number because of your intrusion into a discussion with no facts beyond a form email.

                      The next time you think you have something to add to the discussion at my blog, email it to me so I don't have to humiliate you in your house like you tried to do to me.

                      And, oh...grow the hell up.

                        #20.6 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:25 AM EST
                        Dave Hunter

                        J.L.,

                        The only person being humiliated here is yourself. Does acting like a frothing dog usually get people to hear what you have to say and persuade them to your point of view? You may have delusions of journalistic grandeur and ambitions to join FOX news some day but I wouldn't give up my day job if I were you.

                        • 2 votes
                        #20.7 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:14 PM EST
                        Jonn Lilyea

                        Who do I have to persuade? If you're so stupid that you can't see the truth in front of your face, what hope do I have? But there's an unwritten rule of blogging that you treat other bloggers the way you want to be treated. Scotty here showed me how he wanted to be treated on his blog and I'm behaving like he did on my blog, it's not my fault he's been thoroughly cowed into silence. Since I'm on my second career, I have no ambition to work as a journalist - but I still have integrity. Let me know when you find some.

                          #20.8 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:15 PM EST
                          Scott Isaacs

                          Jonn:

                          You are nothing but a cyber bully. Using the diminutive "Scotty" as if you're putting your two imaginary hands in my chest and shoving me to intimidate me. I've been "cowed" into silence? That's hilarious. I've rendered my opinion and you have rendered your's. I've simply demurred from trying to act like I can intimidate you. I don't intimidate and I don't get intimidated. Q.E.D. Enjoy your afternoon. :-)

                          • 5 votes
                          #20.9 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:30 PM EST
                          trex-138069

                          John: The truth, as in the verifiable facts, are that Obama did not attend the ball, citing security reasons, while Joe Biden did. Everything else -- the notion that it was a deliberate snub, the assumption that Obama hates the military, even the assumption that the medal recipients were offended, is all your interpretation and/or pure guess work. Learn the difference, please, between facts and inferences.

                          • 5 votes
                          #20.10 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:47 PM EST
                          Jonn Lilyea

                          Scotty; Yeah, I'm a cyber bully. Remember that the next time you're tempted to challenge me with your supposition and phony polls in my house. If you had to put with the dimwits my co-blogger and I had to deal with over the last few days, you'd be a bully, too.

                          trex; I never said Obama hates the troops. In fact, in that post I never said a derogatory word about the President. You seem to suffer the same malady as other commenters here - that being the inability to discover the facts of the discussion before shooting off your keyboard. Tell me which security concerns were not present for the VP but would have existed for the President. Please.

                          Way to scurry in and defend your life partner, though. It's heart warming.

                            #20.11 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:29 PM EST
                            Scott Isaacs

                            Jonn:

                            Scotty; Yeah, I'm a cyber bully. Remember that the next time you're tempted to challenge me with your supposition and phony polls in my house. If you had to put with the dimwits my co-blogger and I had to deal with over the last few days, you'd be a bully, too.

                            I've had to deal with people that threatened to assassinate Obama to prevent him from becoming President on my column that I had to forward to the FBI after deleting because threatening to kill a presidential candidate is a federal crime and all. Yet here I am, simply having a discussion with you and not trying to intimidate you. I'm sorry that you find blogging about politics to be so stressful that you feel the need to act this way, but let me warn you now: politics is a vicious hobby. If you get this agitated everytime someone you consider a crank comes to your blog and comments, perhaps you should hang up your keyboard now.

                            Way to scurry in and defend your life partner, though. It's heart warming.

                            Males that use homosexuality as an insult always say more about their own sexuality than their intended target's.

                            P.S.

                            Tell me which security concerns were not present for the VP but would have existed for the President.

                            You were in the military for 20 years and you don't know about classified information? The Secret Service is very protective of such information because groups like Al Qaeda exist. It would be stupid to give your playbook out publicly when at any time you could be walking into an ambush. Amazing to me that you have no conception of mission security.

                            • 3 votes
                            #20.12 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:45 PM EST
                            Jonn Lilyea

                            Sorry. I'm already married, but I'm flattered - well, not really, I'm just being nice.

                              #20.13 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:52 PM EST
                              Jonn Lilyea

                              Your PS; What? What does classified material have to do with anything? There's nothing the Secret Service had to do above and beyond their security measures for the Vice President. You're blathering now. I guess you're some kind of pseudo-para-security guru now, huh?

                              Your whole post was to toot your horn about your phone to call to Mr Roberts and to make up some poll that some goofus supposedly took with the Medal of Honor recipients, despite the fact that I didn't post about the story until the next day when none of the MOH recipients were around to respond to this nebulous poll. Your "source" was blowing smoke up your ass - or you're blowing smoke up up your readers' collective ass.

                              Just like you tried to blow smoke about the security detail. Give it up, stick boy. The only people who'll believe are the ones who want to believe you. The rest of us have too much common sense. Go back to whatever you were doing before you blogged.

                                #20.14 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:47 PM EST
                                Scott Isaacs

                                Jonn:

                                Sorry. I'm already married, but I'm flattered - well, not really, I'm just being nice.

                                Don't flatter yourself. I'm not gay. However, I do find it interesting that the two people disagreeing with you suddenly are in your post. Is this like yelling "Faggot!" on the playground?

                                Your PS; What? What does classified material have to do with anything? There's nothing the Secret Service had to do above and beyond their security measures for the Vice President. You're blathering now. I guess you're some kind of pseudo-para-security guru now, huh?

                                Prove it. If how many Secret Service agents, the depth of their perimeter around the President, where they position snipers, etc. is freely available, go ahead and show me. I'll be happy to recant and say that how the Secret Service protects the President isn't highly classified information.

                                Your whole post was to toot your horn about your phone to call to Mr Roberts and to make up some poll that some goofus supposedly took with the Medal of Honor recipients, despite the fact that I didn't post about the story until the next day when none of the MOH recipients were around to respond to this nebulous poll. Your "source" was blowing smoke up your ass - or you're blowing smoke up up your readers' collective ass.

                                Fine with me, flush your credibility further down the tubes. If my source allows me to quote and attach their name to it, you may be embarrassed and find it difficult to get access to the person you just called a "goofus."

                                Just like you tried to blow smoke about the security detail. Give it up, stick boy. The only people who'll believe are the ones who want to believe you. The rest of us have too much common sense. Go back to whatever you were doing before you blogged.

                                You're seriously going to debate me about whether the group that protects the most important man on the face of the earth classifies as privileged information the measures they take to protect him? Again, do you know anything about mission security? At all?

                                • 5 votes
                                #20.15 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:29 PM EST
                                trex-138069

                                John, am I supposed to be the "life partner" you referenced? ROTFLMAO! Well, Scott, then no one accused you of homosexuality because I'm a woman. I took my screen-name in honor of my mighty Cretaceous namesake Sue in the Chicago Field Museum. For the record, I'm also a very respectable married grandmother, so I am someone's life partner, but definitely not yours. John, I think you get a score of 1.5 out of a possible 10 for deductive reasoning and creative insults here.

                                • 1 vote
                                #20.16 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:56 PM EST
                                Jonn Lilyea

                                OK, here's another reason your whole premise of "security" is wrong; You make reference to a 16-story hotel. There are no 16-story buildings in DC. There's an ordinance in DC that keeps building height below the Capitol Dome - 12 floors is the max. So, I guess that's another way to prove your "research" to be faulty.

                                  #20.17 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:22 AM EST
                                  Scott Isaacs

                                  Jonn:

                                  Apparently not. Because of the height restriction you speak of, the hotel is one of the tallest buildings in D.C.

                                  Have anything else you'd like to "disprove" me on?

                                  • 4 votes
                                  #20.18 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:30 AM EST
                                  Reply
                                  Brian O-837301

                                  Unfortunately President Obama has put forth on  a few occasions an anti American attitude, perceived or true he portrays an elitist not in touch with true American values.

                                  From serveral instances of his lack of respect for the National Anthem to the snubbing of those who without their sacrafice this country would not have survived to date. It pains my heart to see it so.  I quess in his eyes the rubbing elbows with Hollywood elite is more important than honoring true american hero's. I am saddened to say, I feel the true Obama is showing his colors and its not red, white and blue.  We can all only hope my visions are wrong.

                                    Reply#21 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:41 PM EST
                                    jaywow67

                                    Kind of like Bush put forth that he was anti middle class and only cared about large corps and himself.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #21.1 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:21 PM EST
                                    trex-138069

                                    Rest easy, your visions ARE wrong. They are distortions of perception resulting from listening to too much Limbaugh and believing too many hysterical chain-e-mails. Take a walk in the fresh air, turn of Fox, listen to a few people whose opinions are not exactly the same as your own, and you may start to see the world a bit more realistically.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #21.2 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:22 PM EST
                                    Brian O-837301

                                    I dont watch TV news ever, I do read several newspapers. I don't Even have FOX and where I live there is no access to Limbaugh.  I do on the other hand find it funny you list them for anyone who does not see things as you do.  I have voted for both republican and Democrat and have never missed a vote since my 18th birthday in 1978.   I do however read from actual accounts and do see his irreverence to the country.   I would ask to say what I have wrote is not the truth.  1) on several occasions did he not refuse to say the national anthem and put his hand over his heart?  2) Did he or did he not go to the ball in question?  It was deemed important to all other presidents since its inception.  All prior presidents but this one, Democrat OR Republican has attended to pay honor to those who has fought for this country.  There is nothing I have said that is not factual but saddening

                                      #21.3 - Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:03 PM EST
                                      trex-138069

                                      Re the national anthem, the one thing that's required is to stand (when the anthem is performed live; you don't have to stand up for a recording). Putting your hand over your heart or keeping them respectfully folded is a judgment call. People who circulated that photo claimed, falsely, that Obama was refusing to salute the flag, when in fact he and the other candidates were standing for the national anthem, not the Pledge of Allegiance. Vintage Karl Rove.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #21.4 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:50 PM EST
                                      majorT

                                      Nice piece Brian, After all the filth and low level English being extolled in this article it is refreshing to see someone speak with decency.

                                      I too felt that President Obama should have gone to the MOH ball. Travel time is not a factor for the presidential motorcade. Time to get out and quit our bellyaching and if we really believe what is being said by the conservatives here, GO TO WORK to do something about it in 2010. Yes I am a Vet and am very proud of my service and those that fought with me and continue to fight for our great country. God Bless America.

                                        #21.5 - Fri Feb 6, 2009 8:27 AM EST
                                        Scott Isaacs

                                        majorT:

                                        Nice piece Brian, After all the filth and low level English being extolled in this article it is refreshing to see someone speak with decency.

                                        Excuse me, friend? Say you don't agree but do not even pretend this article wasn't legibly written because reality clearly disagrees.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #21.6 - Fri Feb 6, 2009 12:04 PM EST
                                        Reply
                                        Clark County Politics

                                        This is in response to the comment you left on my blog: 

                                        The real story is that he did not go. As a veteran, and a former Legion District Commander and graduate of the Legion College in 2002, I have met and appreciate Craig Roberts and the fine work the Legion does.

                                        However, there is no excuse For Mr. Obama's failure to go. None.

                                        Here's your sign: "WE ARE AT WAR." The president made a bad choice this time much like the other times he's slighted the military.

                                        Joe Biden is not the President, nor is he Commander and Chief and when you combine Mr. Obama's slight of the most heroic living Americans today with his past slights, no amount of spin can fix that.

                                        The likely reason Mr. Obama did not attend is that he, most likely, did not feel it important enough to make the effort... just like when he blew off the wounded warriors in Landshtul so he could go shoot hoops.

                                        The undeniable, unspinnable fact is that even Bill Clinton, hardly the Military's best friend, found a way to attend. And had Mr. Obama been so inclined, he, too, would have made it happen.

                                        And no amount of spin or eyewash can change that.

                                        10:55 PM

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#22 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:37 AM EST
                                        winsomecowboy

                                        The likely reason Mr. Obama did not attend is that he, most likely, did not feel it important enough to make the effort... just like when he blew off the wounded warriors in Landshtul so he could go shoot hoops.

                                        It would be just as 'likely' that as your second illustration at Landshtul has long been dismissed as a discredited invention to feed the maws of indignation of which you are part.

                                        It is glaringly obvious, tediously obvious that you have no interest in any reality that jars with your finely tuned outrage thus the fact that Landshtul were shown to have requested the visit not take place escapes you because it doesn't fuel your indignation.

                                        In order to maintain your disgust you must of course use your imagination. This you do most predictably. You say 'The likely reason' and 'most likely' , both absolute spin, neither based on anything other than your opinion and as such by definition no more 'likely' than any other singular opinion in the world. One final convulsive use of the imagination straight after where having set up with 'likely' and most likely' you launch yourself into the mind of another individual

                                        "did not feel [emphasis mine] it important enough to make the effort."

                                        So quite matter of factly you set yourself up as a mindreader.

                                        Normally in a post like this I'd ask myself, 'Should I allow myself to enjoy making this person angry?'

                                        In your case I doubt you are ever not angry enough for it to matter.

                                        I mean that German intensive care hospital, to still be finding that personally useful after all that's been written about it? [not just all that suited you and the rest must be lies]

                                        It's a little sad really.

                                        Kinda living breathing, 'Ill thought but passionately scornful kneejerk reaction template #257'

                                        Is that all it takes for you to feel scornful and superiour? a politically inspired fiction since disproven regarding a hospital and your own abilities as a telepathic?

                                        Lordy! Can you be gullible and deceive yourself at the same time?

                                        It seems so.

                                        • 6 votes
                                        #22.1 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:57 AM EST
                                        Scott (Scoop) Butki

                                        (Scott grabs popcorn, it's always fun to watch Winsome getting snarky. Makes mental note to mention Winsome during interview I'm publishing tomorrow about David Denby's book Snark. I took the pro-snark position for the interview)

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #22.2 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:49 AM EST
                                        Jonn Lilyea

                                        He was pestering you at your blog, too? He must be awfully proud of his ONE PHONE CALL to Mr. Roberts if he's pestering everyone. He's going to be mighty busy, though; over seventy blogs linked to my original post.

                                          #22.3 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:47 AM EST
                                          jaywow67

                                          Arn't you proud of youself John.

                                          Oh here's some tripe for you

                                          not refuse to say the national anthem

                                          That is totall bull@!$%# and you know it and just use old rwr to pound your ego.  Not worth the time and effort to explain it to you again.  Just like the old flag pin that even old mccain didn't always wear until the rwr nutwackers make a big deal out of it but I bet you even have one pinned to your jockstrap.

                                          Why no write Obama and ask him directly out why he didn't go.

                                          Personally, I believe the email sent by the AL to Scott.  robertlyn's documents is pure farce.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #22.4 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:30 AM EST
                                          Jonn Lilyea

                                          WTF language is that?

                                            #22.5 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:52 AM EST
                                            jaywow67

                                            I knew you had trouble following the English language just like following anything that you have been given containing facts.  You invent your own to fluff youself up.

                                            Veryyyyyyyy intresting are you.

                                            The bully pretender

                                            Your childish and silly behavior is so similiar to my granddaugher's behavior it makes me laugh.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #22.6 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:33 PM EST
                                            Reply
                                            bill bunka

                                            Scott,thanks a bunch for the info,I guess I was acting like a DEMOCRAT,and blaming the President after hearing them complain for all these years puting the blame on Pres. Bush right or wrong I was getting one in early for my side Bill

                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#23 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:23 AM EST
                                            bill bunka

                                            Scott,thanks for the info,I guess after hearing the democrats complaining about President Bush for   everything that happened in the entire world,I wanted to get my shot in early,By the way he is going to be traveling all over the world in the next four years,If he really wanted to go he would have.thanks for giving me equal time. Bill

                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#24 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:34 AM EST
                                            Clark County Politics

                                            It would be just as 'likely' that as your second illustration at Landshtul has long been dismissed as a discredited invention to feed the maws of indignation of which you are part.

                                            In a world wehere gliitering generalities rule, you take the cake.

                                            You've made this rather moronic assertion, now feel free to back it up?  Who has "discredited" this fact that isn't on Kos, moveon, or Huffington?

                                            If you're going to make such an idiotic claim, then perhaps you might want to back it up.

                                            It is glaringly obvious, tediously obvious that you have no interest in any reality that jars with your finely tuned outrage thus the fact that Landshtul were shown to have requested the visit not take place escapes you because it doesn't fuel your indignation.

                                            It is glaringly obvious, tediously obvious that you have no interest in any reality.  Period.

                                            The "request" (actually, the order) was that, as a Senator, OF COURSE Mr. Obama could visit the troops at Landshtul.  HE JUST COULDN'T MAKE A CAMPAIGN EVENT OUT OF IT.

                                            So, he decided he'd rather play basketball.  Bully for him.

                                            In order to maintain your disgust you must of course use your imagination.

                                            Nah... his continuing slights against the Military, his appointments to his cabinet of liars and criminals, his moronic redistribution of wealth... those types of things make it easy, with no imagination required.  Since you asked.

                                            This you do most predictably. You say 'The likely reason' and 'most likely' , both absolute spin, neither based on anything other than your opinion and as such by definition no more 'likely' than any other singular opinion in the world.

                                            Kind of like your bogus, weak, and lying response, you mean?  As "predictable" as that?

                                            I used the phrases "the likely reason" and "most likely" BECAUSE THAT IS PRECISELY THE TYPE OF PHRASE THAT SCOTT USED, as in:

                                            "...have found out also that the likely reason that Barack Obama attended the auxiliary balls that he did is because six of the balls that he attended were held in the same building. Therefore, attending those balls and the others that he attended were the most efficient with regards to security."

                                            Besides the basic nonsense of that conclusion (You mean that Biden has security different than Obama?  That it's OK to put Biden at some "risk" but not Obama?  Please.) one wonders, did you moronically go after Scott for HIS use of the term?

                                            Of course not.  You're obviously a leftist, and by definition, that means you're a hypocrite with a double standard.  Can't hold someone you agree with to the same standard as someone opposing you, can we?  Why that simply isn't done!

                                            One final convulsive use of the imagination straight after where having set up with 'likely' and most likely' you launch yourself into the mind of another individual

                                            Precisely like Scott did?  By all means, provide me with a link where you attempted to rip a strip off of him FOR DOING THE SAME THING.

                                            "did not feel [emphasis mine] it important enough to make the effort."

                                            So quite matter of factly you set yourself up as a mindreader.

                                            In reality (Something clearly designed to be beyond your grasp) using facts to arrive at a conclusion doesn't require "mind reading."  In this case, it requires reading comprehension, historical accuracy and the ability to analyze, all lacking in the typical self-deluding victim of Bush Derrangement Syndrome such as yourself.

                                            The undeniable, inescapable FACT of the matter is this:  Had Obama WANTED TO GO, HE WOULD HAVE GONE.  And nothing you nor Scott has provided, once you get past the smoke and mirrors of it, changes that one wit.

                                            Normally in a post like this I'd ask myself, 'Should I allow myself to enjoy making this person angry?'

                                            Bitchslapping you like a 6 year old has been kind of a hoot.  But my "anger?"

                                            "Pity."  Go look it up.

                                            In your case I doubt you are ever not angry enough for it to matter.

                                            Good God, the hypocrisy of the left absolutely knows no bounds.  First, an idiot trys (and, admittedly, fails; abysmally) to get on my case about "mindreading," and then, within a very few lines, he does the SAME THING he condemns ME for.

                                            Yup.  Pity is the word.  But I get that you can't help your pathological hypocrisy; after all, as I pointed out, it comes with the leftist territory.

                                            I mean that German intensive care hospital, to still be finding that personally useful after all that's been written about it? [not just all that suited you and the rest must be lies]

                                            Lord, give me patience with idiots.

                                            Landstuhl is an AMERICAN ARMY HOSPITAL that just happens to be IN Germany.

                                            The problem with your moronic take is that soldiers remember.  We remember being compared to Nazi's by that asshat Durbin on the floor of the Senate.  We remember being called "murderers" by that waste of skin Murtha.  We remember Reid telling us that we'd already lost the war and could not win it before the surge.

                                            We have to remember.  We have to remember because we put ourlives on the line for scum like you.  And if the last thing said was all we hung on to, we'd just say the hell with it... let these scumbags fight their own battles.

                                            "After all that's been written about it" doesn't change it.  Obama shares YOUR attitude.  And that makes hima worthless scumbag as a Commander in Chief.

                                            Since you asked.

                                            It's a little sad really.

                                            Your positions, take and spin are more than a "little" sad.  So, I thought I'd take the opportunity to beat your worthless positions to a pulp, just to keep the record straight.

                                            Kinda living breathing, 'Ill thought but passionately scornful kneejerk reaction template #257'

                                            However you choose to characterize your worthless effort is up to you, but I do understand that self-criticism is often the harshest.  There IS help out there for you, if you're willing to look for it, find it and accept it.  You don't HAVE to be a mindless cretin.

                                            Is that all it takes for you to feel scornful and superiour? a politically inspired fiction since disproven regarding a hospital and your own abilities as a telepathic?

                                            I get the you follow the Goebbelian line of telling a lie often enough and loud enough for it to become the truth.  I really do get that.  After all, it's the kind of crap Obama used to get elected, so why wouldn't you?

                                            But again, you reeking hypocrisy about reading MY mind IS a bit over the edge, don't you think?

                                            Lordy! Can you be gullible and deceive yourself at the same time?

                                            Apparently, people can be.  You've pulled it off brilliantly.

                                            Thanks for playing.  We have some lovely parting gifts that lack any sharp edges so you don't hurt yourself, but feel free to come on back here for additional ass-kicking, whenever you need it.

                                              Reply#25 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:23 PM EST
                                              trex-138069

                                              Can you say with a straight face that if Obama HAD visited Landstuhl you wouldn't have flayed him alive for daring to use Our Brave Troops for political purposes? Of course you would. McCain was ready with a TV commercial saying exactly that, in case Obama did go, as well as one attacking him for snubbing them if he didn't. But then McCain must have been seething that after he'd ridiculed Obama for weeks for not going to Iraq, Obama took up the challenge and went, depriving McCain of one of his precious few talking points.

                                              You will interpret anything he does, no matter what he does, as "anti military." And you will do this because that's what you do, it's all you know. You used it against the Clintons, you will use it against Obama, and you will never understand why people don't take you seriously.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #25.1 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:56 PM EST
                                              winsomecowboy

                                              wow, a point by pointer.

                                              All your rebuttal consists again of supposition and distraction overlayed with the same brittle ineffective superority. You miss the whole 'likely' sarcasm and in doing so use it to accuse me of confusing opinion with fact as I did you. and then it goes downhill from there.

                                              Scott was doing it too? Scott did it first? do you realise how childish that sounds?

                                              My worthless positions? quick, run and check. I didn't have any. but you go right ahead and pretend I did if it suits you.

                                              At least you eventually came up with the fact of the matter and i agree, He was invited, he didn't go. Being the most powerful guy on the planet he could have but he didn't.

                                              His priorities differ and were maybe a little more complex than you need to paint him as a dirty snubber.

                                              Why don't you jump into his head and find out what they are?

                                              Oh that's right you already have.

                                              While you may intimidate some with your bluster I'm simply not effected by insults ill conceived, founded on your limitless scorn and missplaced confidence in the construction of argument.

                                              Again, you can't refute stuff with opinion.  You can't refute stuff by distraction and you can't refute anything simply with the power of your opinionated arrogance.

                                              save that stuff for the dining table.

                                              • 5 votes
                                              #25.2 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:58 PM EST
                                              Reply
                                              Clark County Politics

                                              Can you say with a straight face that if Obama HAD visited Landstuhl you wouldn't have flayed him alive for daring to use Our Brave Troops for political purposes?

                                              Sigh.

                                              So much ignorance... so little time.

                                              WHILE THERE (And he actually DID go there) had he chosen to go in and meet the wounded WITHOUT making this a campaign event, NO ONE WOULD HAVE HAD ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT, INCLUDING ME.

                                              The ENTIRE point of the exercise is that Mr. Obama, who had the OPPORTUNITY to go in and meet with the troops, INSTEAD chose to go shoot hoops.

                                              Our wounded soldiers should NEVER be a "campaign" exercise.  That Obama couldn't figure that out is almost as scary as the tonedeafness he's shown about the most important people in the entirety of our government: the sons and daughters that routinely do EVERY DAY what Obama has NEVER done: put their asses on the line for US.

                                              Odd, isn't it, how important that was when Kerry was running and how unimportant it suddenly became when Obama ran.  But then, as I pointed out, hypocrisy abounds on the left.

                                              SInce you asked.

                                              Of course you would.

                                              Gee.  I guess you are, well, wrong.

                                              McCain was ready with a TV commercial saying exactly that, in case Obama did go, as well as one attacking him for snubbing them if he didn't.

                                              As I pointed out, our wounded should NEVER BE USED FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.

                                              Had Obama gone in to make points with the public using the mangled bodies of our troops to do so, he would have deserved even more scorn and disrespect over this issue then he does now.

                                              OBAMA is the one who TRIED to make political hay out of the blood of our children.  HE COULD have gone in to meet with these people WITHOUT making it a campaign commercial: OBAMA CHOSE NOT TO.

                                              That you see that as "OK" is just another symptom of the left.

                                              Again, since you asked.

                                              But then McCain must have been seething that after he'd ridiculed Obama for weeks for not going to Iraq, Obama took up the challenge and went, depriving McCain of one of his precious few talking points.

                                              Will you leftists make up your minds?

                                              I've been attacked here by a leftist for mindreading, yet both my attacker AND you have no problem doing the same thing.

                                              See, it doesn't concern you that an empty suit playing a senator on TV had SOOOO much to say about Iraq...BUT HAD NEVER SET FOOT IN TYHE COUNTRY... AND THEN TRIED TO INTERFERE WITH FOREIGN POLICY WHEN HE DID GO.

                                              You will interpret anything he does, no matter what he does, as "anti military."

                                              Gee... thank you so much for reading my mind, again.  But you'd better be careful... Losesomecowboy might throw a hissy fit against YOUR post for the mindreading bit.

                                              But tell me, please: how can I continue to nail Obama... if he stops giving me a hammer?

                                              On your watch, no matter what he does to us, you'll be dancing around him like the yap dog dancing around Spike, saying "atta boy, Spike... great job!"

                                              It is ENTIRELY possible that this man will hurt the military, just like Reid, Pelosi, Murtha and that idiot Durbin hurt the military... or should those clowns be congratulated for their morale-crushing remarks?

                                              And when he DOES hurt the military, are you one of those that will dutifully and ignorantly attack anyone calling him on it?

                                              Not a lot of diversity of thought in your world, is there?

                                              And you will do this because that's what you do, it's all you know. You used it against the Clintons, you will use it against Obama, and you will never understand why people don't take you seriously.

                                              The truth hurts, but it's still the truth.  And no one here, including you, have pointed out where anything I've written is untrue... you two just want me to stop writing it.

                                              As for being "taken seriously?"

                                              Well, YOU took me "seriously" enough to come in here so I could crush your nonsensical position.  So, obviously, YOU "took em seriously." 

                                              So, you win today's statement of the oxymoron.

                                                Reply#26 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:43 PM EST
                                                Scott Isaacs

                                                So I take it you voted for Kerry since people who have fought in a war are a cut above everyone else?

                                                • 4 votes
                                                #26.1 - Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:49 PM EST
                                                trex-138069

                                                CCP: You're right, I shouldn't be dignifying you with attention. But Obama decided not to visit the hospital because the hospital administrators asked him not to. They didn't want to appear to be endorsing any candidate in the upcoming election, and were afraid that any visit, with or without cameras, would convey that impression, and Obama abided by their judgment.

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #26.2 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:01 PM EST
                                                The Incredulous One

                                                trex:

                                                because the hospital administrators asked him not to

                                                what the...you just pull this outta your, er, hat or what? Here's what happened. No hospital canceled no nuthin!

                                                ++ Visit to US Military Bases Cancelled ++ 1:42 p.m.: SPIEGEL ONLINE has learned that Obama has cancelled a planned short visit to the Rammstein and Landstuhl US military bases in the southwest German state of Rhineland-Palatinate. The visits were planned for Friday. "Barack Obama will not be coming to us," a spokesperson for the US military hospital in Landstuhl announced. "I don't know why." Shortly before the same spokeswoman had announced a planned visit by Obama.

                                                Don't you believe your own president when he said:

                                                I was going to be accompanied by one of my advisors, a former military officer."

                                                Continued Obama, "And we got notice that he would be treated as a campaign person, and it would therefore be perceived as political because he had endorsed my candidacy but he wasn’t on the Senate staff. That triggered then a concern that maybe our visit was going to be perceived as political. And the last thing that I want to do is have injured soldiers and the staff at these wonderful institutions having to sort through whether this is political or not or get caught in the crossfire between campaigns."

                                                "So rather than go forward and potentially get caught up in what might have been considered a political controversy of some sort," Obama said, "what we decided was that we not make a visit and instead I would call some of the troops that were there. So that essentially would be the extent of the story."

                                                He canceled the visit because if one of his campaign advisors (in fact, retired Major General Jonathan S. Gration) who was not part of the Senate staff went along, it would be perceived as political. So leave the poor guy in the hotel room! Instead, they canceled.

                                                N.B. Instead of visiting the troops without Gration which he could easily have done as a U.S. Senator (and actually they could have left his entire political staff at the side of the road, making an even bigger point of his concern for the troops), they canceled the visit. Instead, he played hoops, got some exercise and rested up for the big crowds in Germany.

                                                Open your eyes.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #26.3 - Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:22 AM EST
                                                Scott Isaacs

                                                TIO:

                                                Have you considered that the former military officer was going with him to oversee conditions at the hospitals and report on them to Obama after their visit? It was Gration, after all, with the experience in the military and not Obama.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #26.4 - Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:01 AM EST
                                                The Incredulous One

                                                Scott:

                                                The role of Gration was whatever it was and is subject to speculation, but Obama could have visited the troops without him. Besides, your idea suggests there is more value in a visit that never took place than in a visit that could have taken place albeit without Obama's adviser along.

                                                  #26.5 - Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:53 AM EST
                                                  Reply
                                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
                                                  Leave a Comment:
                                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                  You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                  (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                  Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                  FUN STUFF:
                                                  • Leaderboard |
                                                  • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                  • Top of the Vine |
                                                  • Newsvine Live |
                                                  • Newsvine Archives |
                                                  • The Greenhouse |
                                                  COMPANY STUFF:
                                                  • Code of Honor |
                                                  • Company Info |
                                                  • Contact Us |
                                                  • Jobs |
                                                  • User Agreement |
                                                  • Privacy Policy |
                                                  • About our ads
                                                  LEGAL STUFF:
                                                  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com